These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15733212)

  • 1. The use of in vitro data in risk assessment.
    Bernauer U; Oberemm A; Madle S; Gundert-Remy U
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 15733212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.
    Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metabolism, variability and risk assessment.
    Dorne JL
    Toxicology; 2010 Feb; 268(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 19932147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of in vitro toxicity data in hazard and risk assessment: current limitations and future perspectives.
    Blaauboer BJ
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 18586419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of genetic toxicology information for risk assessment.
    Dearfield KL; Moore MM
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005 Dec; 46(4):236-45. PubMed ID: 16258925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.
    Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amended final report on the safety assessment of polyacrylamide and acrylamide residues in cosmetics.
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24 Suppl 2():21-50. PubMed ID: 16154914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure-triggered reproductive toxicity testing under the REACH legislation: a proposal to define significant/relevant exposure.
    Bernauer U; Heinemeyer G; Heinrich-Hirsch B; Ulbrich B; Gundert-Remy U
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Jan; 176(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 18068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods.
    Worth AP; Bassan A; De Bruijn J; Gallegos Saliner A; Netzeva T; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Tsakovska I; Eisenreich S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 17365963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The refinement of uncertainty/safety factors in risk assessment by the incorporation of data on toxicokinetic variability in humans.
    Dorne JL; Renwick AG
    Toxicol Sci; 2005 Jul; 86(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 15800035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of emerging technologies in toxicology and safety assessment: regulatory perspectives.
    Leighton JK
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 16040567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing.
    Gubbels-van Hal WM; Blaauboer BJ; Barentsen HM; Hoitink MA; Meerts IA; van der Hoeven JC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Aug; 42(3):284-95. PubMed ID: 15979772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Future of toxicology--predictive toxicology: An expanded view of "chemical toxicity".
    Richard AM
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 19(10):1257-62. PubMed ID: 17040094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the incorporation of chemical-specific information in risk assessment.
    Clewell HJ; Andersen ME; Blaauboer BJ
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Aug; 180(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 18588959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of toxicogenomics to genetic toxicology risk assessment.
    Thybaud V; Le Fevre AC; Boitier E
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Jun; 48(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 17567850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.