These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15733683)

  • 1. Supporting health impact assessment in practice.
    Mindell J; Boltong A
    Public Health; 2005 Apr; 119(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 15733683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accreditation/Performance assessment on-site reviews in Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, and Washington: implications for States and an evolving national model.
    Butler J; Tews D; Raevsky C; Canavese J; Wojciehowski K; Michalak C; Thomas M; Brewster J; Mason M; Schmidt R
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2007; 13(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 17563629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Building evaluation capacity: definitional and practical implications from an Australian case study.
    Naccarella L; Pirkis J; Kohn F; Morley B; Burgess P; Blashki G
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 Aug; 30(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17689328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating health impact assessment.
    Quigley RJ; Taylor LC
    Public Health; 2004 Dec; 118(8):544-52. PubMed ID: 15530933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review article: health impact assessment developments in Sweden.
    Knutsson I; Linell A
    Scand J Public Health; 2010 Mar; 38(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 20056783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A National Health Service Hospital's cardiac rehabilitation programme: a qualitative analysis of provision.
    O'Driscoll JM; Shave R; Cushion CJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1908-18. PubMed ID: 17880480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
    Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC
    Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ensuring the success of local public health workforce assessments: using a participatory-based research approach with a rural population.
    Alejos A; Weingartner A; Scharff DP; Ablah E; Frazier L; Hawley SR; St Romain T; Orr SA; Wright KS
    Public Health; 2008 Dec; 122(12):1447-55. PubMed ID: 18752816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mind the gap: developing the PH workforce in the North East and Yorkshire and Humber regions: a scoping stakeholder study.
    Brown JS; Learmonth A
    Public Health; 2005 Jan; 119(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15560899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The potential contribution of realistic evaluation to small-scale community interventions.
    Lhussier M; Carr SM; Robson A
    Community Pract; 2008 Sep; 81(9):25-8. PubMed ID: 18834025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fit for practice? An exploration of the development of newly qualified nurses using focus groups.
    Clark T; Holmes S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Sep; 44(7):1210-20. PubMed ID: 16872614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing a cross-site evaluation tool for diverse health interventions.
    Kruger DJ; Morrel-Samuels S; Davis-Satterla L; Harris-Ellis BJ; Slonim A
    Health Promot Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 19116423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comments by the Working Group for Methods of Economic Evaluation in Health Care (AG MEG) to IQWiG's Draft Guidelines "Methods for Assessment of the Relation of Benefits to Costs in the German Statutory Health Care System"].
    Krauth C; John J; Aidelsburger P; Brüggenjürgen B; Hansmeier T; Hessel F; Kohlmann T; Moock J; Rothgang H; Schweikert B; Seitz R; Wasem J;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e1-16. PubMed ID: 18661452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A question of value: a qualitative study of vocational dental practitioners' views on oral healthcare systems and their future careers.
    Gallagher JE; Clarke W; Eaton KA; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2009 Jan; 16(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 19126350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An educational process to strengthen primary care nursing practices in São Paulo, Brazil.
    Chiesa AM; Fracolli LA
    Int Nurs Rev; 2007 Dec; 54(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 17958670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.