These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1573370)

  • 1. Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.
    Weiss SJ; Weissman RD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Mar; 57(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 1573370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.
    Bushnell MC; Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jan; 33(1):101-18. PubMed ID: 7365398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.
    Steinhauer GD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 7175429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discriminated interresponse times: role of autoshaped responses.
    Palmer DC; Donahoe JW; Crowley MA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Nov; 44(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 4086973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses.
    Dougherty DM; Lewis P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 1940765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.
    Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination of compound stimuli involving the presence or absence of a distinctive visual feature.
    Farthing GW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Nov; 16(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 5150043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of variable-interval value and amount of training on stimulus generalization.
    Walker DJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Sep; 70(2):139-63. PubMed ID: 9768505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local contrast and maintained generalization.
    Hinson JM; Malone JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 7452131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of search cost on foraging and feeding: a three-component chain analysis.
    Peden BF; Rohe MS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Sep; 42(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 6502067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.
    Allan RW; Matthews TJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 1774537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. STIMULUS ASPECTS OF AVERSIVE CONTROLS: STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION FOLLOWING DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    HOFFMAN HS; FLESHLER M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 May; 7(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 14143911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons.
    Ploog BO; Zeigler HP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jan; 65(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 8583197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stimulus similarity in discrimination training upon wavelength generalization in pigeons.
    Tomie A; Davitt GA; Thomas DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):945-54. PubMed ID: 1150957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus generalization from feeder to response key in the acquisition of autoshaped pecking.
    Sperling SE; Perkins ME; Duncan HJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 May; 27(3):469-78. PubMed ID: 16812007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The peak shift in stimulus generalization: equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock.
    Grusec T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 5660704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.
    Biederman GB; McDonald KG; Heighington GA; Vanayan M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 3361267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response factors in delay discounting: evidence for Pavlovian influences on delay discounting in pigeons.
    Holt DD; Carlson JD; Follett VL; Jerdee NJ; Kelley DP; Muhich KM; Tiry AM; Reetz NK
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():37-43. PubMed ID: 23618788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus generalization and operant context renewal.
    Podlesnik CA; Miranda-Dukoski L
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():93-8. PubMed ID: 26241660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.