These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15733875)

  • 1. Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Langenegger EJ; Odendaal HJ; Grové D
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Mar; 88(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 15733875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N; Gupta A; Kriplani A; Bhatla N; Parul
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labor induction for premature rupture of membranes using vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Abraham C; Meirowitz N; Kohn N
    Am J Perinatol; 2014 Mar; 31(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 23592314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe?
    Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
    Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Sifakis S; Angelakis E; Avgoustinakis E; Fragouli Y; Mantas N; Koukoura O; Vardaki E; Koumantakis E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Apr; 275(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 17028904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term.
    Faucett AM; Daniels K; Lee HC; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ
    J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24157494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial.
    Young DC; Delaney T; Armson BA; Fanning C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227245. PubMed ID: 31923193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes and costs between misoprostol and dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Nadia Bennett K; Park H; Cioffi J; Calixte R; Vintzileos A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3732-6. PubMed ID: 26782646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.