These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15733876)

  • 1. Soft forceps.
    Roshan DF; Petrikovsky B; Sichinava L; Rudick BJ; Rebarber A; Bender SD
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Mar; 88(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 15733876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section.
    Bhide A; Guven M; Prefumo F; Vankalayapati P; Thilaganathan B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jul; 20(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 17674268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Spellacy WN; Pietrantoni M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 81(5 ( Pt 1)):688-94. PubMed ID: 8469455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Abenhaim HA; Morin L; Benjamin A; Kinch RA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
    Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obstetric forceps pad designed to reduce infant trauma.
    Hebertson RM; Sanders MS; Warenski JC; Heywood ER; Larkin RM; Bryson MJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 3969242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.