These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

828 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15734622)

  • 1. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation.
    Vogel R; Indermühle A; Reinhardt J; Meier P; Siegrist PT; Namdar M; Kaufmann PA; Seiler C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(5):754-62. PubMed ID: 15734622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].
    Wacker CM; Bauer WR
    Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 12669220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collateral-flow measurements in humans by myocardial contrast echocardiography: validation of coronary pressure-derived collateral-flow assessment.
    Vogel R; Zbinden R; Indermühle A; Windecker S; Meier B; Seiler C
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Jan; 27(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 16207739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absolute myocardial blood flow determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Abdelmoneim SS; Dhoble A; Bernier M; Moir S; Hagen ME; Ness SA; Abdel-Kader SS; Pellikka PA; Mulvagh SL
    Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(20):1662-8. PubMed ID: 19584062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and assessment of its transmural distribution with real-time power modulation myocardial contrast echocardiography.
    Van Camp G; Ay T; Pasquet A; London V; Bol A; Gisellu G; Hendrickx G; Rafter P; Melin JA; Vanoverschelde JL
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Mar; 16(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 12618735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography.
    Linka AZ; Sklenar J; Wei K; Jayaweera AR; Skyba DM; Kaul S
    Circulation; 1998 Nov; 98(18):1912-20. PubMed ID: 9799213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of myocardial perfusion and determination of coronary stenosis severity during hyperemia using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography.
    Leong-Poi H; Le E; Rim SJ; Sakuma T; Kaul S; Wei K
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2001 Dec; 14(12):1173-82. PubMed ID: 11734784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy volunteers: comparison with positron emission tomography.
    Dijkmans PA; Knaapen P; Sieswerda GT; Aiazian E; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC; Kamp O
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Mar; 19(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 16500491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection and quantification of coronary stenosis severity with myocardial contrast echocardiography.
    Wei K
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2001; 44(2):81-100. PubMed ID: 11568821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves.
    Masugata H; Peters B; Lafitte S; Strachan GM; Ohmori K; DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Jan; 37(1):262-9. PubMed ID: 11153750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of intravascular and extravascular mechanisms of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by myocardial contrast echocardiography.
    Soliman OI; Knaapen P; Geleijnse ML; Dijkmans PA; Anwar AM; Nemes A; Michels M; Vletter WB; Lammertsma AA; ten Cate FJ
    Heart; 2007 Oct; 93(10):1204-12. PubMed ID: 17488767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of myocardial microvascular disease using contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus: prospective comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Abdelmoneim SS; Basu A; Bernier M; Dhoble A; Abdel-Kader SS; Pellikka PA; Mulvagh SL
    Diab Vasc Dis Res; 2011 Oct; 8(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 21933841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for assessment of myocardial perfusion at rest in a patient with left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Hagendorff A; Pfeiffer D; Rother T; Becher H
    Z Kardiol; 2003 Oct; 92(10):876-83. PubMed ID: 14579053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of left bundle-branch block on cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and perfusion reserve: implications for myocardial contrast echocardiography versus radionuclide perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Hayat SA; Dwivedi G; Jacobsen A; Lim TK; Kinsey C; Senior R
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(14):1832-41. PubMed ID: 18378614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire.
    Kurita T; Sakuma H; Onishi K; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Yamanaka T; Tanigawa T; Kitamura T; Takeda K; Ito M
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Feb; 30(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 19098020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of myocardial blood flow velocity reserve with myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison with quantitative gated Technetium 99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography.
    Dawson D; Rinkevich D; Belcik T; Jayaweera AR; Rafter P; Kaul S; Wei K
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Nov; 16(11):1171-7. PubMed ID: 14608289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity information during baseline conditions: adenosine-free assessment of functional coronary lesion severity.
    van de Hoef TP; Nolte F; Damman P; Delewi R; Bax M; Chamuleau SA; Voskuil M; Siebes M; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ; Meuwissen M
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 22787017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplified quantification of myocardial flow reserve with flurpiridaz F 18: validation with microspheres in a pig model.
    Sherif HM; Nekolla SG; Saraste A; Reder S; Yu M; Robinson S; Schwaiger M
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):617-24. PubMed ID: 21441533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quantitative high resolution voxel-wise assessment of myocardial blood flow from contrast-enhanced first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: microsphere validation in a magnetic resonance compatible free beating explanted pig heart model.
    Schuster A; Sinclair M; Zarinabad N; Ishida M; van den Wijngaard JP; Paul M; van Horssen P; Hussain ST; Perera D; Schaeffter T; Spaan JA; Siebes M; Nagel E; Chiribiri A
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 16(10):1082-92. PubMed ID: 25812572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of absolute myocardial blood flow during first-pass MR perfusion imaging using a dual-bolus injection technique: comparison to single-bolus injection method.
    Christian TF; Aletras AH; Arai AE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1271-7. PubMed ID: 18421683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.