These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1573541)

  • 21. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
    Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes.
    Mayfield L; Bratthall G; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Feb; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 8849842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An assessment of the validity of a constant force electronic probe in measuring probing depths.
    Hull PS; Clerehugh V; Ghassemi-Aval A
    J Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 66(10):848-51. PubMed ID: 8537866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
    Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
    J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
    Eickholz P; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison between measurements made with a conventional periodontal pocket probe, an electronic pressure probe and measurements made at surgery.
    Galgut PN; Waite IM
    Int Dent J; 1990 Dec; 40(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 2276830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
    Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of attachment loss measurements in a longitudinal clinical trial.
    Best AM; Burmeister JA; Gunsolley JC; Brooks CN; Schenkein HA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 2212086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproducibility of pocket depth and attachment level measurements when using a flexible splint.
    Isidor F; Karring T; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):662-8. PubMed ID: 6594353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study of inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pocket depth and attachment level.
    Fleiss JL; Mann J; Paik M; Goultchin J; Chilton NW
    J Periodontal Res; 1991 Mar; 26(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1826526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of manual and pressure-controlled periodontal probing.
    Kalkwarf KL; Kaldahl WB; Patil KD
    J Periodontol; 1986 Aug; 57(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 3528451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of a conventional probe with electronic and manual pressure-regulated probes.
    Perry DA; Taggart EJ; Leung A; Newburn E
    J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):908-13. PubMed ID: 7823271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Within-mouth correlations and reliabilities for probing depth and attachment level.
    Fleiss JL; Park MH; Chilton NW
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jul; 58(7):460-3. PubMed ID: 3476716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe--the Florida probe.
    Gibbs CH; Hirschfeld JW; Lee JG; Low SB; Magnusson I; Thousand RR; Yerneni P; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Feb; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3162246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe.
    Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
    J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: influence of tine shape and probing force.
    Bulthuis HM; Barendregt DS; Timmerman MF; Loos BG; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9650880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
    Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
    J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of direct and indirect clinical attachment level measurements.
    Corraini P; Baelum V; Lopez R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):896-905. PubMed ID: 23869826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.