These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1573541)

  • 41. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
    Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
    J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reliability of attachment level measurements using the cementoenamel junction and a plastic stent.
    Clark DC; Chin Quee T; Bergeron MJ; Chan EC; Lautar-Lemay C; de Gruchy K
    J Periodontol; 1987 Feb; 58(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 3469400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
    Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter.
    Garnick JJ; Silverstein L
    J Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 71(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10695944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Correlation between electronic and visual readings of pocket depths with a newly developed constant force probe.
    Magnusson I; Fuller WW; Heins PJ; Rau CF; Gibbs CH; Marks RG; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3162464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
    Ahmed N; Watts TL; Wilson RF
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 8783050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements.
    Badersten A; Nilvéus R; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Aug; 11(7):475-85. PubMed ID: 6589244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparative evaluation of probing depth and clinical attachment level using a manual probe and Florida probe.
    Kour A; Kumar A; Puri K; Khatri M; Bansal M; Gupta G
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2016; 20(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 27563204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correlation of periodontal probe penetration and degree of inflammation.
    Anderson GB; Caffesse RG; Nasjleti CE; Smith BA
    Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 1930842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical attachment level measurements with and without the use of a stent by a computerized electronic probe.
    Machion L; Andia DC; Nociti Júnior FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2007 Apr; 9(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 17506385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Option-4 algorithm for Florida pocket depth probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific probeable crevice depth measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers P; Johnson NW; Slaney R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Aug; 26(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 10450811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The reproducibility and validity of furcation measurements using a pressure-calibrated probe.
    Kim TS; Knittel M; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 8891933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
    Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Attachment level measurements with a constant force electronic probe.
    Magnusson I; Clark WB; Marks RG; Gibbs CH; Manouchehr-Pour M; Low SB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 3162465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Non-Gaussian distribution of differences between duplicate probing depth measurements.
    Janssen PT; Faber JA; van Palenstein Helderman WH
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Jul; 14(6):345-9. PubMed ID: 3476508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of tine shape of 3 periodontal probes using 2 probing forces.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Reiker J; Loos BG
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 23(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 8739173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.