These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1573541)

  • 61. Comparison of periodontal and peri-implant probing by depth-force pattern analysis.
    Mombelli A; Mühle T; Brägger U; Lang NP; Bürgin WB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):448-54. PubMed ID: 9555203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Periodontal probe use in general practice in Florida.
    Heins PJ; Fuller WW; Fries SE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Jul; 119(1):147-50. PubMed ID: 2760347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The location of the periodontal probe tip in health and disease.
    Hancock EB; Wirthlin MR
    J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):124-9. PubMed ID: 6939832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Evaluation of a new furcation stent as a fixed reference point for class II furcation measurements.
    Laxman VK; Khatri M; Devaraj CG; Reddy K; Reddy R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 19279968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Errors in measuring parameters associated with periodontal health and disease.
    Kingman A; Löe H; Anerud A; Boysen H
    J Periodontol; 1991 Aug; 62(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 1920014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evaluation of a new periodontal probe tip design. A clinical and in vitro study.
    Vartoukian SR; Palmer RM; Wilson RF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):918-25. PubMed ID: 15367198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Inter-examiner reproducibility of probing pocket depths in molar furcation sites.
    Moriarty JD; Scheitler LE; Hutchens LH; Delong ER
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Jan; 15(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 3422247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Change in attachment level.
    Gunsolley JC; Best AM
    J Periodontol; 1988 Jul; 59(7):450-6. PubMed ID: 3166057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Assessment of the WHO partial recording approach in identification of individuals highly susceptible to periodontitis.
    Aucott DM; Ashley FP
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Jun; 14(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 3459612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Comparative reproducibility of proximal probing depth using electronic pressure-controlled and hand probing.
    Mullally BH; Linden GJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Apr; 21(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 8195446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of probes for microbial contamination following use in periodontal pockets of various depths.
    Holt LA; Williams KB; Cobb CM; Keselyak NT; Jamison CL; Brand VS
    J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 15088872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The effect of different diagnostic thresholds on incidence of disease progression.
    Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Reasner DS; Howell TH
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):872-8. PubMed ID: 9736369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Probing site configuration in patients with untreated periodontitis. A study of horizontal positional error.
    Watts TL
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Sep; 16(8):529-33. PubMed ID: 2778087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. In vitro accuracy and reproducibility of automated and conventional periodontal probes.
    Samuel ED; Griffiths GS; Petrie A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 May; 24(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 9178114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Probing depth at re-evaluation following initial periodontal therapy to indicate the initial response to treatment.
    Claffey N; Loos B; Gantes B; Martin M; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 2654197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants.
    Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R; Schotte A; Darius P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 8597621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The relative effects of therapy and periodontal disease on loss of probing attachment after root debridement.
    Claffey N; Loos B; Gantes B; Martin M; Heins P; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 3162461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility in keratinized tissue width assessment with 3 methods for mucogingival junction determination.
    Guglielmoni P; Promsudthi A; Tatakis DN; Trombelli L
    J Periodontol; 2001 Feb; 72(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 11288784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.