These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1573550)

  • 1. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss.
    Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4 Suppl):367-72. PubMed ID: 1573550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic Methods for the Detection of Progressive Alveolar Bone Loss.
    Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63 Suppl 4S():367-372. PubMed ID: 29539691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crestal bone loss from serial intraoral radiographs.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Carpio L; Christersson LA; Clerehugh V
    J Periodontol; 1992 Aug; 63(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 1507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between probing attachment loss and computerized radiographic analysis in monitoring progression of periodontitis.
    Deas DE; Pasquali LA; Yuan CH; Kornman KS
    J Periodontol; 1991 Feb; 62(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2027061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elastase as an indicator of periodontal disease progression.
    Palcanis KG; Larjava IK; Wells BR; Suggs KA; Landis JR; Chadwick DE; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 1573538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.
    Teeuw WJ; Coelho L; Silva A; van der Palen CJ; Lessmann FG; van der Velden U; Loos BG
    J Periodontal Res; 2009 Feb; 44(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18973543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
    Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes.
    Griffiths GS; Brägger U; Fourmousis I; Sterne JA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 9446977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of alveolar bone levels from bitewing, periapical and panoramic radiographs in periodontitis patients.
    Gedik R; Marakoglu I; Demirer S
    West Indian Med J; 2008 Sep; 57(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 19566026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic alveolar bone loss in untreated Taiwan Chinese subjects with adult periodontitis measured by the digital scanning radiographic image analysis method.
    Hou GL; Hung CC; Yang YS; Shieh TY; Tsai CC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 12775664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss.
    Khocht A; Janal M; Harasty L; Chang KM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 134(11):1468-75. PubMed ID: 14664265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography using radiographs exposed in a multicenter trial.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; Magnusson I; Johnson B; Meredith MP; Cavanaugh PF; Gerlach RW
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Apr; 31(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 8814584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of periodontal probes and radiographs in clinical trials of diagnostic tests.
    Reddy MS
    Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 9151548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Lang NP; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 1809671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic determinants of implant performance.
    Reddy MS; Wang IC
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():136-45. PubMed ID: 11276736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized generation of lesion models for evaluating subtraction radiography.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 2097225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.