These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15736142)

  • 1. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.
    Claxton K; Sculpher M; McCabe C; Briggs A; Akehurst R; Buxton M; Brazier J; O'Hagan T
    Health Econ; 2005 Apr; 14(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 15736142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Culyer AJ
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jul; 1(Pt 3):299-318. PubMed ID: 18634698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.
    Andronis L; Barton P; Bryan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. PubMed ID: 19500484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?
    Pearson S; Littlejohns P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17716419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Schlander M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Probabilistic uncertainty analysis and stochastic league tables.
    Baltussen RM; Hutubessy RC; Evans DB; Murray CJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 11987434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].
    Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(47):2254-8. PubMed ID: 12481524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regarding probabilistic analysis and computationally expensive models: necessary and required?
    Caro JJ; Getsios D; Möller J
    Value Health; 2007; 10(4):317-8; author reply 319. PubMed ID: 17645686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
    Williams IP; Bryan S
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handling uncertainty of the economic evaluation result: sensitivity analysis.
    Limwattananon S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S59-65. PubMed ID: 19253488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity analysis for handling uncertainty in an economic evaluation.
    Limwattananon S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S59-64. PubMed ID: 24964700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Has NICE been nice to cancer?
    Summerhayes M; Catchpole P
    Eur J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 42(17):2881-6. PubMed ID: 17070032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bridging the gap between methods research and the needs of policy makers: a review of the research priorities of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
    Longworth L; Sculpher MJ; Bojke L; Tosh JC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Apr; 27(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 21447260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision making by NICE: examining the influences of evidence, process and context.
    Cerri KH; Knapp M; Fernández JL
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2014 Apr; 9(2):119-41. PubMed ID: 23688554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From cost-effectiveness information to decision-making on liquid-based cytology: Mind the gap.
    Legood R; Wolstenholme J; Gray A
    Health Policy; 2009 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18619702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.