305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15736315)
1. When privacy fails: invoking a property paradigm to mandate the destruction of DNA samples.
Harlan LM
Duke Law J; 2004 Oct; 53(7):179-219. PubMed ID: 15736315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
Joh EE
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2006; 100(2):857-84. PubMed ID: 17340772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood rights: the body and information privacy.
Alston B
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):426-40. PubMed ID: 15957586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting genetic privacy.
Annas GJ
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):43-44, 46. PubMed ID: 11654493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Willing to give up their DNA, but privacy too?
Donnan S
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Apr; 92(99):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic non-discrimination, privacy and property rights.
Stulic M
E Law; 2000 Jun; 7(2):E5. PubMed ID: 16903021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
Herlica DA
Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Genetic fingerprints and computerised databases].
Sabatier M
J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 15005514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [DNA profile in legal practice. Conclusion].
Pierre B
J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):361-2. PubMed ID: 15005517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
Will JF
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A genetic heritage betrayed or empowered?
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Nov; 16(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 9831028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties.
Noble AA
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16789939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA database statutes & privacy in the information age.
Webster WR
Health Matrix Clevel; 2000; 10(1):119-40. PubMed ID: 11184040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Iceland's plan for genomics research: facts and implications.
Greely HT
Jurimetrics; 2000; 40():153-91. PubMed ID: 16295921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.
Rosen C
New Atlantis; 2003; (1):37-52. PubMed ID: 15584193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA blueprints, personhood, and genetic privacy.
Miller H
Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):179-221. PubMed ID: 10182217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Family privacy and death--Antigone, war, and medical research.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2005 Feb; 352(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 15689591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whose DNA is it anyway? European court, junk DNA, and the problem with prediction.
Sarkar SP; Adshead G
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 20542946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
Scherer RC
Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
