These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15736736)

  • 1. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.
    Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Pynsent PB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 15736736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
    de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.
    Loughead JM; Chesney D; Holland JP; McCaskie AW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 15736735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A five-year radiostereometric follow-up of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; McMinn DJ; Daniel J; Lundberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Sep; 89(9):1140-3. PubMed ID: 17905947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
    von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
    Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Eswaramoorthy VK; Biant LC; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Nov; 91(11):1454-8. PubMed ID: 19880889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
    Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
    Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years.
    Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polyethylene Hip Resurfacing to Treat Arthritis and Severe Acetabular Insufficiency.
    Pritchett JW
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Nov; 33(11):3508-3513. PubMed ID: 30131198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure.
    Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.