These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15736840)

  • 21. Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations.
    Turssi CP; de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 11699181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Yap AU; Sau CW; Lye KW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 9687119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material.
    Warren DP; Colescott TD; Henson HA; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 12214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative wear resistance of reinforced glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Teo JC; Teoh SH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 11504433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness.
    Mörmann WH; Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Sener B; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():113-25. PubMed ID: 23455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins.
    dos Santos PH; Consani S; Correr Sobrinho L; Coelho Sinhoreti MA
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 12967075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laboratory study of the loads, speeds and times to finish and polish direct restorative materials.
    Jones CS; Billington RW; Pearson GJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):686-92. PubMed ID: 16102082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G; Sen D; Aydin M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.
    Tagtekin DA; Yanikoglu FC; Bozkurt FO; Kologlu B; Sur H
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 15081556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas M
    J Dent; 2005 May; 33(5):389-98. PubMed ID: 15833394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of bleaching agents on the surface hardness of tooth colored restorative materials.
    Taher NM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):18-26. PubMed ID: 15915201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Color changes of restorative materials exposed in vitro to cola beverage.
    Mohan M; Shey Z; Vaidyanathan J; Vaidyanathan TK; Munisamy S; Janal M
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 18767510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
    Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of selected mouthwashes on the surface roughness of resin modified glass-ionomer restorative materials.
    Sadaghiani L; Wilson MA; Wilson NH
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 16530262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.