These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15736840)

  • 41. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 16268397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surface roughness of three resin restorative materials after finishing and polishing.
    Cadenaro M; Biasotto M; Contardo L; Chiesa R; Di Lenarda R; Dorigo E
    Minerva Stomatol; 2006 Apr; 55(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 16618992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Wu SS; Chelvan S; Tan ES
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 15765964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of equivalent abrasive grit sizes utilizing differing polishing motions on selected restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Miranda FJ; Coury TL
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Apr; 27(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 8941847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of repeated fluoride varnish application on different restorative surfaces.
    Salama FS; Schulte KM; Iseman MF; Reinhardt JW
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):54-61. PubMed ID: 17091140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of in-office tooth bleaching on the microhardness of six dental esthetic restorative materials.
    Polydorou O; Mönting JS; Hellwig E; Auschill TM
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 16472855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Mujdeci A; Gokay O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 16616125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An FTIR study of the effects of artificial saliva on the physical characteristics of the glass ionomer cements used for art.
    Yip HK; To WM
    Dent Mater; 2005 Aug; 21(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 16026664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect ofartificial accelerated aging on color stability and surface roughness of indirect composites.
    Zanin FR; Garcia Lda F; Casemiro LA; Pires-de-Souza Fde C
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Mar; 16(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18468319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
    Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The weight change of various light-cured restorative materials stored in water.
    Keyf F; Yalçin F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 15915206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials.
    Guler AU; Yilmaz F; Kulunk T; Guler E; Kurt S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 16046965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs.
    Uçtaşli MB; Bala O; Güllü A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1197-202. PubMed ID: 15544656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites.
    de Moraes RR; Marimon JL; Schneider LF; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L; Bueno M
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 18266654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement bonded to different tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Taher NM; Ateyah NZ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):25-34. PubMed ID: 17277824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.