301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15736893)
21. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability.
Araujo MW; Hovey KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-40. PubMed ID: 14974813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Manual periodontal probing in supportive periodontal treatment.
Armitage GC
Periodontol 2000; 1996 Oct; 12():33-9. PubMed ID: 9567991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Controlled force measurements of gingival attachment level made with the Toronto automated probe using electronic guidance.
Karim M; Birek P; McCulloch CA
J Clin Periodontol; 1990 Sep; 17(8):594-600. PubMed ID: 2212091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical parameters: biological validity and clinical utility.
Mombelli A
Periodontol 2000; 2005; 39():30-9. PubMed ID: 16135062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation of periodontal probe penetration and degree of inflammation.
Anderson GB; Caffesse RG; Nasjleti CE; Smith BA
Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 1930842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with moderate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.
Osborn JB; Stoltenberg JL; Huso BA; Aeppli DM; Pihlstrom BL
J Periodontol; 1992 Apr; 63(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 1573541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements.
Holtfreter B; Alte D; Schwahn C; Desvarieux M; Kocher T
J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 39(11):1032-41. PubMed ID: 22924328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe.
Eickholz P; Grotkamp FL; Steveling H; Mühling J; Staehle HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Apr; 12(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 11251665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of manual and automated probing in an untreated periodontitis population.
Oringer RJ; Fiorellini JP; Koch GG; Sharp TJ; Nevins ML; Davis GH; Howell TH
J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1156-62. PubMed ID: 9444589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automatic probe technology--saving time and improving accuracy?
Magnusson I; Clark WB
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1990 May; 18(5):25-8. PubMed ID: 1696972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
