These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comparison of methods for estimating the number of true null hypotheses in multiplicity testing. Hsueh HM; Chen JJ; Kodell RL J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):675-89. PubMed ID: 14584715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis. Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates. Tang Y; Ghosal S; Roy A Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1126-34. PubMed ID: 17501943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple testing on standardized mortality ratios: a Bayesian hierarchical model for FDR estimation. Ventrucci M; Scott EM; Cocchi D Biostatistics; 2011 Jan; 12(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 20577014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate. Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Genovese CR; Lazar NA; Nichols T Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):870-8. PubMed ID: 11906227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian pharmacovigilance signal detection methods revisited in a multiple comparison setting. Ahmed I; Haramburu F; Fourrier-Réglat A; Thiessard F; Kreft-Jais C; Miremont-Salamé G; Bégaud B; Tubert-Bitter P Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(13):1774-92. PubMed ID: 19360795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the operational characteristics of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate procedure. Green GH; Diggle PJ Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article27. PubMed ID: 18052910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical Bayes and resampling based multiple testing procedure controlling tail probability of the proportion of false positives. van der Laan MJ; Birkner MD; Hubbard AE Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article29. PubMed ID: 16646847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wavelets and functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain. Bullmore E; Fadili J; Maxim V; Sendur L; Whitcher B; Suckling J; Brammer M; Breakspear M Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S234-49. PubMed ID: 15501094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing. Shaffer JP Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study. Dudoit S; Gilbert HN; van der Laan MJ Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):716-44. PubMed ID: 18932138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Bayesian determination of threshold for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. Chen J; Sarkar SK Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3174-89. PubMed ID: 16345048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian hypothesis testing-use in interpretation of measurements. Miller G; Martz H; Little T; Bertelli L Health Phys; 2008 Mar; 94(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 18301098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Yang Z; Rannala B Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]