These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15737092)

  • 1. Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models.
    Zheng G; Freidlin B; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 15737092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust genomic control and robust delta centralization tests for case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Zhang H; Yang Y; Zheng G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17310128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximizing association statistics over genetic models.
    González JR; Carrasco JL; Dudbridge F; Armengol L; Estivill X; Moreno V
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 18228557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An optimal dose-effect mode trend test for SNP genotype tables.
    Yamada R; Okada Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 18688846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Order-restricted scores test for the evaluation of population-based case-control studies when the genetic model is unknown.
    Hothorn LA; Hothorn T
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 19650055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic model testing and statistical power in population-based association studies of quantitative traits.
    Lettre G; Lange C; Hirschhorn JN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 17352422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving power for testing genetic association in case-control studies by reducing the alternative space.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Zheng G
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):266-76. PubMed ID: 19397584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and application of genomic control methods for genome-wide association studies using non-additive models.
    Tsepilov YA; Ried JS; Strauch K; Grallert H; van Duijn CM; Axenovich TI; Aulchenko YS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81431. PubMed ID: 24358113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust Mantel-Haenszel test under genetic model uncertainty allowing for covariates in case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Fung WK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):695-705. PubMed ID: 22009791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymptotic distribution for epistatic tests in case-control studies.
    Liu T; Thalamuthu A; Liu JJ; Chen C; Wang Z; Wu R
    Genomics; 2011 Aug; 98(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 21620949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A strategy to discover genes that carry multi-allelic or mono-allelic risk for common diseases: a cohort allelic sums test (CAST).
    Morgenthaler S; Thilly WG
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 615(1-2):28-56. PubMed ID: 17101154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A powerful method of combining measures of association and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for fine-mapping in case-control studies.
    Song K; Elston RC
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):105-26. PubMed ID: 16220513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage group sequential robust tests in family-based association studies: controlling type I error.
    Yan LK; Zheng G; Li Z
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 72(Pt 4):557-65. PubMed ID: 18325081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A population-based family study (II): Segregation analysis.
    Zhao LP; Quiaoit F; Hsu L; Davidov O; Holte S
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):945-9. PubMed ID: 9433605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of max and min scores for trend tests for association when the genetic model is unknown.
    Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(16):2657-66. PubMed ID: 12898550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of the multiallelic trend test.
    Czika W; Weir BS
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 15032775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.