These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15738031)

  • 1. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.
    Oleske DM; Glandon GL; Giacomelli GJ; Hohmann SF
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Aug; 26(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 1869443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Birth; 2004 Mar; 31(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15015987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of scheduled cesarean delivery in patients on a teaching versus private service: adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and neonatal outcomes.
    Laye MR; Dellinger EH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):577-82; discussion 582-4. PubMed ID: 16777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress.
    Yee W; Amin H; Wood S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 111(4):823-8. PubMed ID: 18378740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates.
    Bailit JL; Love TE; Dawson NV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 194(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 16458637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
    Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals.
    Hsu CC; Shieh GR; Wu CS; Shen HC; Tang CH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 16325330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.
    Holubkov R; Holt VL; Connell FA; LoGerfo JP
    Health Serv Res; 1998 Aug; 33(3 Pt 1):531-48. PubMed ID: 9685121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuity of nursing care and its link to cesarean birth rate.
    Gagnon AJ; Meier KM; Waghorn K
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17324175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates of cesarean delivery among Puerto Rican women--Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland, 1992-2002.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2006 Jan; 55(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 16437056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery.
    Liu S; Heaman M; Joseph KS; Liston RM; Huang L; Sauve R; Kramer MS;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 15802414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery.
    Finkler MD; Wirtschafter DD
    J Perinatol; 1997; 17(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 9134516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.