These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15738548)

  • 1. Goodbye mercury? Blood pressure measurement and its future.
    Varughese GI; Lip GY
    J R Soc Med; 2005 Mar; 98(3):89-90. PubMed ID: 15738548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goodbye mercury.
    Sowby D
    J R Soc Med; 2005 Jun; 98(6):294-5. PubMed ID: 15928392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mad as a respiratory physiologist.
    Goodman N
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jan; 54(498):77. PubMed ID: 15002440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement.
    O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 12604931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer?
    Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Feb; 8(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 12604932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will the millimetre of mercury be replaced by the kilopascal?
    Colquitt PJ
    J Hypertens; 1999 Feb; 17(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 10067802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [European regulations and the future of mercury sphygmomanometers in the clinical setting].
    Vinyoles E; Armengol F; Bayó J; Mengual L; Salvadó A; Pepió JM;
    Med Clin (Barc); 2003 Apr; 120(12):460-3. PubMed ID: 12689554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated sphygmomanometers should not replace manual ones, based on current evidence.
    Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Aug; 21(8):845; author reply 846. PubMed ID: 18648356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure for change: unresolved issues in blood pressure measurement.
    Aylett M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Feb; 49(439):136-9. PubMed ID: 10326270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring blood pressure using the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Valler-Jones T; Wedgbury K
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Feb 10-23; 14(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15788933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Has conventional sphygmomanometry ended with the banning of mercury?
    O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Feb; 7(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 12040241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Ireland J
    BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1249. PubMed ID: 11388188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why automated office blood pressure should now replace the mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Myers MG
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2010 Jul; 12(7):478-80. PubMed ID: 20629808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From mercury sphygmomanometer to electric device on blood pressure measurement: correspondence of Minamata Convention on Mercury.
    Asayama K; Ohkubo T; Hoshide S; Kario K; Ohya Y; Rakugi H; Umemura S
    Hypertens Res; 2016 Apr; 39(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 26818650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of sphygmomanometers at pharmacies.
    Erdem DG; Erdem E; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Selim N; Demiray F; Sari A; Akpolat T
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2009; 32(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 19622898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Yang W; Gu D; Chen J; Jaquish CE; Rao DC; Wu X; Hixson JE; Duan X; Kelly TN; Hamm LL; Whelton PK; He J;
    Am J Med Sci; 2008 Nov; 336(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 19011391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Issues surrounding blood pressure measurements.
    Health Devices; 2002 Aug; 31(8):305, 307. PubMed ID: 12216341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How should BP be measured in the office?
    Tobe SW; Izzo JL
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Mar; 10(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 26839184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.