BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1573878)

  • 1. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?
    Munro KJ; Salisbury VA
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):408-13. PubMed ID: 12403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
    Westwood GF; Bamford JM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements.
    Ickes MA; Hawkins DB; Cooper WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 1768884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
    Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring in-the-ear gain of hearing aids by the acoustic reflex method.
    Tonisson W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Mar; 18(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 1127901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Customized acoustic transform functions and their accuracy at predicting real-ear hearing aid performance.
    Munro KJ; Hatton N
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10708074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.
    Cox RM; Risberg DM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Nov; 51(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 3773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probe-tube microphone measures in patients with open-mastoid surgery: real-ear-to-coupler differences and real-ear unaided responses.
    Liu TC; Lin KN
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 10720821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of adults using three earmold configurations.
    Munro KJ; Buttfield LM
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 15937410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.