These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15738916)

  • 1. A dose-volume-based tool for evaluating and ranking IMRT treatment plans.
    Miften MM; Das SK; Su M; Marks LB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):1-14. PubMed ID: 15738916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
    Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simplifying intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans with fewer beam angles for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma.
    Takamiya R; Missett B; Weinberg V; Akazawa C; Akazawa P; Zytkovicz A; Bucci MK; Lee N; Quivey JM; Xia P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 8(2):26-36. PubMed ID: 17592464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A sensitivity-guided algorithm for automated determination of IMRT objective function parameters.
    Zhang X; Wang X; Dong L; Liu H; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2935-44. PubMed ID: 16964872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RapidArc radiotherapy planning for prostate cancer: single-arc and double-arc techniques vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Sze HC; Lee MC; Hung WM; Yau TK; Lee AW
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 21925863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose comparisons for conformal, IMRT and VMAT prostate plans.
    Sale C; Moloney P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Dec; 55(6):611-21. PubMed ID: 22141609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of IMRT beam complexity through the use of beam modulation penalties in the objective function.
    Matuszak MM; Larsen EW; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):507-20. PubMed ID: 17388168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of forward planning with automated inverse planning for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer without IMRT.
    Mendes R; Lavrenkov K; Bedford JL; Henrys A; Ashley S; Brada M
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 16564591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiobiologic comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and conformal radiotherapy in treating lung cancer accounting for secondary malignancy risks.
    Komisopoulos G; Mavroidis P; Rodriguez S; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N; Nikiforidis GC; Sakellaropoulos GC
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25168596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved critical structure sparing with biologically based IMRT optimization.
    Qi XS; Semenenko VA; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1790-9. PubMed ID: 19544798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HDR brachytherapy combined with 3-D conformal vs. IMRT in left-sided breast cancer patients including internal mammary chain: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters.
    Kinhikar RA; Deshpande SS; Mahantshetty U; Sarin R; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(3):1-12. PubMed ID: 16143787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
    Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of proton therapy and IMRT treatment plans for prostate radiotherapy.
    Dowdell SJ; Metcalfe PE; Morales JE; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19239059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
    Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmentation of IMRT plans for radical lung radiotherapy delivery with the step-and-shoot technique.
    Nioutsikou E; Bedford JL; Christian JA; Brada M; Webb S
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):892-901. PubMed ID: 15125007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.