These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15738921)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of image quality from three CT simulation scanners.
    McCann C; Alasti H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):55-70. PubMed ID: 15738921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality for radiotherapy CT simulators with different scanner bore size.
    Tomic N; Papaconstadopoulos P; Aldelaijan S; Rajala J; Seuntjens J; Devic S
    Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():65-71. PubMed ID: 29472093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.
    Birnbaum BA; Hindman N; Lee J; Babb JS
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 17185663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Wu V; Podgorsak MB; Tran TA; Malhotra HK; Wang IZ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4451-63. PubMed ID: 21859046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
    Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner.
    Husby E; Svendsen ED; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):224-231. PubMed ID: 28921910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners.
    Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Way TW; Larson SC; Christodoulou EG; Kim J
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3006-17. PubMed ID: 16964879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.
    Flohr TG; Stierstorfer K; Ulzheimer S; Bruder H; Primak AN; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2536-47. PubMed ID: 16193784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flat-panel-detector-based volumetric CT: performance evaluation of imaging for skeletal structures of small animals in comparison to multislice CT.
    Obenauer S; Dullin C; Alves F; Missbach-Guentner J; Grabbe E; Heuser M
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17189841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of helical and cine acquisitions for 4D-CT imaging with multislice CT.
    Pan T
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):627-34. PubMed ID: 15789609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit.
    Meeks SL; Harmon JF; Langen KM; Willoughby TR; Wagner TH; Kupelian PA
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2673-81. PubMed ID: 16193798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating multislice imaging into x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry.
    Johnston H; Hilts M; Jirasek A
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1666-77. PubMed ID: 25832056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative assessment of four-dimensional computed tomography image acquisition quality.
    Starkschall G; Desai N; Balter P; Prado K; Luo D; Cody D; Pan T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 8(3):1-20. PubMed ID: 17712299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical performance evaluation of a 256-slice CT-scanner for four-dimensional imaging.
    Mori S; Endo M; Tsunoo T; Kandatsu S; Tanada S; Aradate H; Saito Y; Miyazaki H; Satoh K; Matsushita S; Kusakabe M
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1348-56. PubMed ID: 15259638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system.
    McCollough CH; Zink FE
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2223-30. PubMed ID: 10587202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm filter on image quality and radiation dose: validation on phantoms.
    Bai M; Chen J; Raupach R; Suess C; Tao Y; Peng M
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 19235377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.