These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15738925)

  • 1. A tissue-equivalent phantom series for mammography dosimetry.
    Argo WP; Hintenlang K; Hintenlang DE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(4):112-9. PubMed ID: 15738925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification.
    Bencomo JA; Chu C; Tello VM; Cho SH; Ibbott GS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 15753932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of equivalent breast phantoms for different age groups of Taiwanese women: an experimental approach.
    Dong SL; Chu TC; Lin YC; Lan GY; Yeh YH; Chen S; Chuanga KS
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4094-100. PubMed ID: 21859009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
    Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit.
    Meeks SL; Harmon JF; Langen KM; Willoughby TR; Wagner TH; Kupelian PA
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2673-81. PubMed ID: 16193798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of DR and CR digital mammography systems based on phantom and breast dosimetry.
    Ramos M; Ferrer S; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI; Salas MD
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5659-62. PubMed ID: 17946321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
    Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Direct radiographic magnification mammography with a new microfocus tube. Experimental studies of resolution and radiation exposure].
    Post K; Hermann KP; Funke M; Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):604-9. PubMed ID: 9411476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
    Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.
    Dance DR; Young KC; van Engen RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul; 54(14):4361-72. PubMed ID: 19550001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
    Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the modulation transfer function of digitally reconstructed radiographs in radiotherapy treatment planning using a point phantom.
    Kirwin SL; Langmack KA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):N251-5. PubMed ID: 16204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design, development, and implementation of the radiological physics center's pelvis and thorax anthropomorphic quality assurance phantoms.
    Followill DS; Evans DR; Cherry C; Molineu A; Fisher G; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2070-6. PubMed ID: 17654910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.