279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739131)
1. Educational research--to IRB, or not to IRB?
Miser WF
Fam Med; 2005 Mar; 37(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 15739131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Journal Policy Statement--IRB approval for educational research.
Weiss BD; Smith MA; Magill MK
Fam Med; 2005 Mar; 37(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 15739139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems.
Puglisi T
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendations for federal "super agency" would affect institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12530378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Resuscitation research and consent: ethical and practical issues.
Bircher NG
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5 Suppl):S379-84. PubMed ID: 12771587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Exempt" research after the privacy rule.
Barnes M; Gallin KE
IRB; 2003; 25(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 14649247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How can an IRB avoid the use of obsolete consent forms?
Adkinson NF; Starklauf BL; Blake DA
IRB; 1983; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 11649510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review.
Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E
IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New federal guidance adds duties for institutional review boards (IRBs).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Nov; 20(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 16358479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics in medical research.
P N G Med J; 1973 Sep; 16(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 11661003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. IRBs and the new rule on research with children.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 16270437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council].
Shelton JD
IRB; 1999; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality improvement or research: a distinction without a difference?
Doezema D; Hauswald M
IRB; 2002; 24(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 13678030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]