165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739272)
1. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court rulings in two cases broaden legal protections for mentally ill criminal defendants.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 43(7):752-3. PubMed ID: 1355462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Synthetic competence and consent. Ought a defendant be drugged to stand trial?
Graber GC; Marsh FH
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 34567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law.
Gutheil TG; Mills MJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Insanity defense continues to draw attention in Washington, state capitols.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1983 Jan; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6826158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Insanity plea in Connecticut.
Phillips BL; Pasewark RA
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 7284609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.
Pasewark RA; Seidenzahl D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 540170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perry v. Louisiana: can a state treat an incompetent prisoner to ready him for execution?
Evans GL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 1777688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Guilty but mentally ill: a retreat from the insanity defense.
Sherman SL
Am J Law Med; 1981; 7(2):237-64. PubMed ID: 7304614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guilty but mentally ill--in search of a perspective.
Ermutlu IM
J Med Assoc Ga; 1983 May; 72(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 6864120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychiatrists and the insanity defense.
Rotenberg LA
Pa Med; 1983 Sep; 86(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 6685857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conference report: a mental health law symposium on the insanity defense and civil commitment.
Huey K
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1978 Jul; 29(7):443-9. PubMed ID: 658896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The judge's view of competency evaluations.
Owens H; Rosner R; Harmon RB
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 4074904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The rights of involuntary patients to refuse pharmacotherapy: what is reasonable?
Mills MJ
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(3):313-34. PubMed ID: 7284608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The mental health professional and the legal system. Committee on Psychiatry and Law. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry.
Rep Group Adv Psychiatry; 1991; (131):1-192. PubMed ID: 2000462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Should competence be coerced?
Reamer FG; Kelly MJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):30; discussion 30-2. PubMed ID: 1976609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competence to stand trial in Connecticut.
Herron DC; Zonana HV; Crane LE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 6640120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The merger of incompetency and certification: the illustration of unauthorised medical contact in the psychiatric context.
Gostin LO
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(2):127-67. PubMed ID: 521199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Disposition of insanity defense cases in Oregon.
Bloom JL; Bloom JD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7317657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of judicial review of patients' refusal to accept antipsychotic medications at the Minnesota Security Hospital.
Farnsworth MG
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 1674892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
