604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739272)
21. Supreme court of Canada's "Beautiful Mind" case.
Gray JE; O'Reilly RL
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 19643478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process.
Finkle MJ; Kurth R; Cadle C; Mullan J
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 19784943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
Borger BA
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Judges confirm the fundamental right to physical integrity].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2012 Oct; 65(10):626-8. PubMed ID: 23098036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Involuntary medication treatment for competency restoration of 22 defendants with delusional disorder.
Herbel BL; Stelmach H
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 17389345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Psychosis and punishment. Should the mentally ill be drugged so they can face execution?
Szegedy-Maszak M
US News World Rep; 2001 Mar; 130(12):50-1. PubMed ID: 11277042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
Marshall GS
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
Saks ER
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 47(3):689-761. PubMed ID: 16617526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Consent and the mentally disordered detained patient.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2003 Dec 11-2004 Jan 7; 12(22):1331-4. PubMed ID: 14688654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Supreme Court rulings in two cases broaden legal protections for mentally ill criminal defendants.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 43(7):752-3. PubMed ID: 1355462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Supreme Court limits permissible scope of government's ability to force medication of mentally ill defendants.
Prieto-Gonzalez M
J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):737-9. PubMed ID: 14968679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Exploring ethical, legal, and professional issues with the mentally ill on death row.
Plichta JE
J Forensic Nurs; 2008; 4(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 18798882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Forcible medication of mentally ill criminal defendants: the case of Russell Eugene Weston, Jr.
Feinberg A
Stanford Law Rev; 2002 Apr; 54(4):769-91. PubMed ID: 11944661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Letters.
Felthous AR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):590. PubMed ID: 23233481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
