These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739275)
1. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion). Sunstein CR Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion: state action. Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An expansion of Right to Choose v. Byrne: public funding for abortions for those buying insurance under the new Health Care Bill. Weimer S Seton Hall Law Rev; 2012; 42(4):1679-712. PubMed ID: 23264974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare--abortions: final regulation. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61597-8. PubMed ID: 10297597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs. Diamond E New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions. Vanzi LM N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion arena: recent activity. Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization. Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The real pro-life stance--health care reform and abortion funding. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2010 Apr; 362(16):e56. PubMed ID: 20375398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why the government is not required to subsidize abortion counseling and referral. Hirt TC Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1895-915. PubMed ID: 10288539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicaid funding for abortion: providers' experiences with cases involving rape, incest and life endangerment. Kacanek D; Dennis A; Miller K; Blanchard K Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2010 Jun; 42(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 20618746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rights of embryo and foetus in private law. Jost TS Am J Comp Law; 2002; 50(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 15212066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon. Hagen JD America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]