These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739275)

  • 21. The right of access of the medically underserved to health care services.
    Brandin PA
    J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):297-345. PubMed ID: 6976402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate.
    America (NY); 1991 Jun; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abortion 'gag' rule.
    Notkin H
    West J Med; 1991 Aug; 155(2):191. PubMed ID: 1926860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Senate Resolution 409: submission of a resolution directing Senate legal counsel to appear as amicus curiae.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Apr; 126(60):S3935-47. PubMed ID: 11664076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sterilizations and abortions--federal financial participation: final rules.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(217):52145-75. PubMed ID: 10297259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Banning human cloning: an acceptable limit on scientific inquiry or an unconstitutional restriction of symbolic speech?
    Hsu MB
    Georgetown Law J; 1999 Jul; 87(7):2399-430. PubMed ID: 10558578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Econometric analyses of U.S. abortion policy: a critical review.
    Klick J
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):751-82. PubMed ID: 16700120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion and Medicaid: the public funding dilemma--Zbaraz v. Quern.
    Price LR
    John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1979; 12(3):609-36. PubMed ID: 11664067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Restricted abortion funding approved.
    Stoltz MK
    Health Care Week; 1978 Oct; 2(16):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10324744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Commerce Clause and federal abortion law: why progressives might be tempted to embrace federalism.
    Goldberg J
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Oct; 75(1):301-54. PubMed ID: 17115483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Questions and answers on HEW abortion regulations.
    Sellers B; Langston L
    Gov Relat Note; 1978 Feb; 4(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10297094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
    Bourne RW
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion: Medicaid's unwanted child?
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1975 Sep; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 11663168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Office of Human Development Services--service programs for families and children, individuals and families, and aged, blind, or disabled persons; federal financial participation in state claims for abortions.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(209):61599-600. PubMed ID: 10244085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unprinted Amendment No. 1137 [(to prohibit grants by the Legal Services Corporation to provide legal assistance relating to abortion[.
    Humphrey GJ
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jun; 126(97):S6870-7. PubMed ID: 11664149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class action brought against hospital to allow abortions.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Oct; 59(10):34, 36, 38 passim. PubMed ID: 689652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Women and children last--the predictable effects of proposed federal funding cuts.
    Annas GJ; Mariner WK
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Apr; 364(17):1590-1. PubMed ID: 21470003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.