These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739308)

  • 1. Submission on draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.
    Canadian Bar Association. National Health Law and Family Law Sections
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15739308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brickbats and bouquets for the draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.
    Baylis F
    Health Law Rev; 2001; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15739304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Privacy and assisted human reproduction: a discussion paper.
    Foster J; Slater B
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 15739319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004).
    Fineschi V; Neri M; Turillazzi E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Sep; 31(9):536-9. PubMed ID: 16131556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bill C-13 The Assisted Human Reproduction Act: examining the arguments against a regulatory approach.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15739313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
    Sedillo Lopez A
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies.
    Bernier L; Grégoire D
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Dec; 30(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 15574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clones, controversy, and criminal law: a comment on the proposal for legislation governing assisted human reproduction.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 39(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 12611408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to privacy and assisted reproductive technologies: a comparative study of the law of Germany and the U.S.
    Voss AS
    N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 2002; 21(2):229-305. PubMed ID: 15212072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproduction without assisting over-collection: fair information practices and the assisted human reproduction agency of Canada.
    Gruben V
    Health Law J; 2009; 17():229-67. PubMed ID: 20608320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining a policy rationale for the criminal regulation of reproductive technologies.
    Campbell A
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15739314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
    Gürtin ZB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 21962527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New assisted reproductive technology laws in Victoria: a genuine overhaul or just cut and paste?
    Thorpe R; Petersen K; Pitts MK; Baker HW
    J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):835-50. PubMed ID: 21774278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproduction in Italy.
    Wray E; Incorvati G
    Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Aug; (180):21-2. PubMed ID: 12739537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clones, controversy, confusion and criminal law: a reply to Professor Caulfield.
    Anand S
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 16211738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies in Nigeria: placing the law above medical technology.
    Koyonda SO
    Comp Int Law J South Afr; 2001 Jul; 34(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 12755144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016: A commentary.
    Timms O
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 29550747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brief of the Law Reform Commission of Canada to the Royal Commission on new reproductive technologies.
    Jones DJ
    Health Law Can; 1992; 13(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 10121310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal Republic of Germany: new problems, new solutions.
    Frank R
    J Fam Law; 1990-1991; 29(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 16032827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.