224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739316)
1. Donate a definition.
Herder M
Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15739316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics.
Crockin SL
Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Betwixt and between human stem cell guidelines and legislation.
Baylis F
Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15739317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Washington insider: federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
Doerflinger RM
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 16425497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research on human embryos, stem cells and cloning -- one year since the passing of Australian federal legislation: Australia around the world and back again.
Magri S
E Law; 2003 Dec; 10(4):E7. PubMed ID: 16903024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The application of traditional criminal law to misappropriation of gametic materials.
Ayala K
Am J Crim Law; 1997; 24(3):503-39. PubMed ID: 16086480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Moore 10 years later--still trying to fill the gap: creating a personal property right in genetic material.
Seeney EB
New Engl Law Rev; 1998; 32(4):1131-91. PubMed ID: 12778925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
Sheinbach DM
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Fowler HL
Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The protection of the human embryo in vitro. Report by the Working Party of the Human Embryo and Fetus.
Council of Europe. Steering Committee on Bioethics
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2004; 10(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 15459990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stem cells and the states: promulgating constitutional bans on embryonic experimentation.
Harris MR
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 2002; 37(1):243-91. PubMed ID: 15214358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rights of embryo and foetus in private law.
Jost TS
Am J Comp Law; 2002; 50(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 15212066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research ethics. When embryonic stem cell lines fail to meet consent standards.
Sugarman J; Siegel AW
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):379. PubMed ID: 18927375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
Langley LS; Blackston JW
J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lives of the embryo.
Christ Century; 2005 Jun; 122(13):5. PubMed ID: 16206452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
Triber GA
Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
Waldman EA
Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get?
Stephens KU
South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulating human embryo research in Australia: recent developments.
Petersen K
J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 12194466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
