135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739516)
1. Comparison of chemiluminescence and ultraviolet ozone monitor responses in the presence of humidity and photochemical pollutants.
Kleindienst TE; Hudgens EE; Smith DF; McElroy FF; Bufalini JJ
Air Waste; 1993 Feb; 43(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15739516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanism and elimination of a water vapor interference in the measurement of ozone by UV absorbance.
Wilson KL; Birks JW
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(20):6361-7. PubMed ID: 17120566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences.
Spicer CW; Joseph DW; Ollison WM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Nov; 60(11):1353-64. PubMed ID: 21141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.
Ollison WM; Crow W; Spicer CW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):855-63. PubMed ID: 23926854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites.
Leston AR; Ollison WM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Nov; 67(11):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28633004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance, chemiluminescence, and DOAS instruments for ambient ozone monitoring.
Williams EJ; Fehsenfeld FC; Jobson BT; Kuster WC; Goldan PD; Stutz J; McClenny WA
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Sep; 40(18):5755-62. PubMed ID: 17007137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in air quality and tropospheric composition due to depletion of stratospheric ozone and interactions with climate.
Tang X; Wilson SR; Solomon KR; Shao M; Madronich S
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2011 Feb; 10(2):280-91. PubMed ID: 21253665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions.
Long RW; Whitehill A; Habel A; Urbanski S; Halliday H; Colón M; Kaushik S; Landis MS
Atmos Meas Tech; 2021 Mar; 14(3):1783-1800. PubMed ID: 34017362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of calibration environment on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.
LeBouf RF; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 23786144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Smog chamber simulation of ozone formation from atmospheric photooxidation of propane].
Huang LH; Mo CR; Xu YF; Jia L
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Aug; 33(8):2551-7. PubMed ID: 23213871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement capability of field portable organic vapor monitoring instruments under different experimental conditions.
Coffey CC; Pearce TA; Lawrence RB; Hudnall JB; Slaven JE; Martin SB
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jan; 6(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18949604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficiency of clay--TiO2 nanocomposites on the photocatalytic elimination of a model hydrophobic air pollutant.
Kibanova D; Cervini-Silva J; Destaillats H
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Mar; 43(5):1500-6. PubMed ID: 19350926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential interference bias in ozone standard compliance monitoring.
Leston AR; Ollison WM; Spicer CW; Satola J
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Oct; 55(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 16295271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of calibration and environmental condition on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.
Coffey C; LeBouf R; Lee L; Slaven J; Martin S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(11):670-80. PubMed ID: 23016630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).
Romieu I; Gouveia N; Cifuentes LA; de Leon AP; Junger W; Vera J; Strappa V; Hurtado-Díaz M; Miranda-Soberanis V; Rojas-Bracho L; Carbajal-Arroyo L; Tzintzun-Cervantes G;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Oct; (171):5-86. PubMed ID: 23311234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of personal ozone exposure using ambient concentrations and influencing factors.
Niu Y; Cai J; Xia Y; Yu H; Chen R; Lin Z; Liu C; Chen C; Wang W; Peng L; Xia X; Fu Q; Kan H
Environ Int; 2018 Aug; 117():237-242. PubMed ID: 29763819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's surface.
Madronich S; McKenzie RL; Björn LO; Caldwell MM
J Photochem Photobiol B; 1998 Oct; 46(1-3):5-19. PubMed ID: 9894350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and Field Calibration of a Low-Cost Ozone Monitor at a Regulatory Urban Monitoring Station.
Masiol M; Squizzato S; Chalupa D; Rich DQ; Hopke PK
Aerosol Air Qual Res; 2018 Aug; 18(8):2029-2037. PubMed ID: 32983236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
