260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15739532)
1. Multidirectional flexibility analysis of cervical artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.
Kotani Y; Cunningham BW; Abumi K; Dmitriev AE; Ito M; Hu N; Shikinami Y; McAfee PC; Minami A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Feb; 2(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 15739532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.
Barrey C; Mosnier T; Jund J; Perrin G; Skalli W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidirectional flexibility analysis of anterior and posterior lumbar artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.
Kotani Y; Cunningham BW; Abumi K; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; Ito M; Shikinami Y; McAfee PC; Minami A
Eur Spine J; 2006 Oct; 15(10):1511-20. PubMed ID: 16552532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of a metal-on-metal cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis.
Colle KO; Butler JB; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Theodore N; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1640-9. PubMed ID: 24094992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Dmitriev AE; Cunningham BW; Hu N; Sell G; Vigna F; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 15897831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation.
Stieber JR; Quirno M; Kang M; Valdevit A; Errico TJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics.
Puttlitz CM; Rousseau MA; Xu Z; Hu S; Tay BK; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2809-14. PubMed ID: 15599283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
