238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15740438)
21. Math = male, me = female, therefore math not = me.
Nosek BA; Banaji MR; Greenwald AG
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jul; 83(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 12088131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Making gender matter: the role of gender-based expectancies and gender identification on women's and men's math performance in Sweden.
Eriksson K; Lindholm T
Scand J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 48(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 17669223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Different groups, different threats: a multi-threat approach to the experience of stereotype threats.
Shapiro JR
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Apr; 37(4):464-80. PubMed ID: 21441217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exposure to scientific theories affects women's math performance.
Dar-Nimrod I; Heine SJ
Science; 2006 Oct; 314(5798):435. PubMed ID: 17053140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of prevention focus under stereotype threat: Initial cognitive mobilization is followed by depletion.
Ståhl T; Van Laar C; Ellemers N
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jun; 102(6):1239-51. PubMed ID: 22409487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Distracted by the Unthought - Suppression and Reappraisal of Mind Wandering under Stereotype Threat.
Schuster C; Martiny SE; Schmader T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122207. PubMed ID: 25815814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stereotype threat and executive functions: which functions mediate different threat-related outcomes?
Rydell RJ; Van Loo KJ; Boucher KL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Mar; 40(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 24345711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An age apart: the effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias.
Abrams D; Eller A; Bryant J
Psychol Aging; 2006 Dec; 21(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 17201490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Choking under the pressure of a positive stereotype: gender identification and self-consciousness moderate men's math test performance.
Tagler MJ
J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 22822682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The benefits of emotional expression for math performance.
Burns KC; Friedman SL
Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 21722052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A threat in the computer: the race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience.
Frantz CM; Cuddy AJ; Burnett M; Ray H; Hart A
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Dec; 30(12):1611-24. PubMed ID: 15536243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains.
Vescio TK; Gervais SJ; Snyder M; Hoover A
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Apr; 88(4):658-72. PubMed ID: 15796666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Self-construal and social comparison effects.
Cheng RW; Lam SF
Br J Educ Psychol; 2007 Mar; 77(Pt 1):197-211. PubMed ID: 17411495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of negative performance stereotypes on learning.
Rydell RJ; Rydell MT; Boucher KL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Dec; 99(6):883-96. PubMed ID: 20919773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stereotype Threat in Virtual Learning Environments: Effects of Avatar Gender and Sexist Behavior on Women's Math Learning Outcomes.
Chang F; Luo M; Walton G; Aguilar L; Bailenson J
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Oct; 22(10):634-640. PubMed ID: 31580726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers.
Logel C; Walton GM; Spencer SJ; Iserman EC; von Hippel W; Bell AE
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19469589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Succeeding in the face of stereotype threat: the adaptive role of engagement regulation.
Leitner JB; Jones JM; Hehman E
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 39(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 23125031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are all interventions created equal? A multi-threat approach to tailoring stereotype threat interventions.
Shapiro JR; Williams AM; Hambarchyan M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 23088232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Working for the self or working for the group: how self- versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups.
Derks B; van Laar C; Ellemers N
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):183-202. PubMed ID: 19210074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Emotional and self-evaluative effects of social comparison information in later life: how are they moderated by collective self-esteem?
Bailis DS; Chipperfield JG
Psychol Aging; 2006 Jun; 21(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 16768576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
