These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15741531)

  • 1. Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(9):1089-99. PubMed ID: 15741531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Partially randomised patient preference trials as an alternative design to randomised controlled trials: systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Wasmann KA; Wijsman P; van Dieren S; Bemelman W; Buskens C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031151. PubMed ID: 31619428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    O'Connor AM; Bennett CL; Stacey D; Barry M; Col NF; Eden KB; Entwistle VA; Fiset V; Holmes-Rovner M; Khangura S; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Rovner D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD001431. PubMed ID: 19588325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does random participant assignment cause fewer benefits in research participants? Systematic review of partially randomized acupuncture trials.
    Koog YH; Min BI
    J Altern Complement Med; 2009 Oct; 15(10):1107-13. PubMed ID: 19848547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis.
    Preference Collaborative Review Group
    BMJ; 2008 Oct; 337():a1864. PubMed ID: 18977792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
    Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insufficient evidence to determine the impact of patient preferences on clinical outcomes in acupuncture trials: a systematic review.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):308-18. PubMed ID: 23347854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the influence of treatment preferences on attrition, adherence and outcomes: a protocol for a two-stage partially randomized trial.
    Sidani S; Fox M; Streiner DL; Miranda J; Fredericks S; Epstein DR
    BMC Nurs; 2015; 14():57. PubMed ID: 26557787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex Disparities in Enrollment in Recent Randomized Clinical Trials of Acute Stroke: A Meta-analysis.
    Strong B; Pudar J; Thrift AG; Howard VJ; Hussain M; Carcel C; de Los Campos G; Reeves MJ
    JAMA Neurol; 2021 Jun; 78(6):666-677. PubMed ID: 33900363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of patient preference on the design and interpretation of clinical trials.
    Feine JS; Awad MA; Lund JP
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 9511845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with trial recruitment, preferences, and treatments received were elucidated in a comprehensive cohort study.
    Donovan JL; Opmeer B; Young GJ; Mills N; Martin RM; Lane JA; Metcalfe C; Peters TJ; Davis M; Turner EL; Walsh E; Neal DE; Hamdy FC;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():200-213. PubMed ID: 31170515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges.
    Corbett MS; Watson J; Eastwood A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 16(1):589. PubMed ID: 27756285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials: conceptual framework and implications for research.
    Bower P; King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Sibbald B
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Aug; 61(3):685-95. PubMed ID: 15899326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient and physician preferences: impact on treatment effectiveness.
    Rheims S; Ryvlin P
    Epileptic Disord; 2012 Sep; 14(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 22947513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of treatment preference effects in clinical trials when some participants are indifferent to treatment choice.
    Walter SD; Turner RM; Macaskill P; McCaffery KJ; Irwig L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):29. PubMed ID: 28219326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.