These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution. van de Wiel MA; Kim KI Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mixture models for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarrays. Jones LB; Bean R; McLachlan GJ; Zhu JX Int J Neural Syst; 2006 Oct; 16(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 17117496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A note on the false discovery rate and inconsistent comparisons between experiments. Higdon R; van Belle G; Kolker E Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 18424815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A constrained polynomial regression procedure for estimating the local False Discovery Rate. Dalmasso C; Bar-Hen A; Broët P BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():229. PubMed ID: 17603882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some comments on instability of false discovery rate estimation. Qiu X; Yakovlev A J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(5):1057-68. PubMed ID: 17099941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies. Datta S; Datta S Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator. Jiao S; Zhang S Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased power of microarray analysis by use of an algorithm based on a multivariate procedure. Krohn K; Eszlinger M; Paschke R; Roeder I; Schuster E Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3530-4. PubMed ID: 15998661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A two-step hierarchical hypothesis set testing framework, with applications to gene expression data on ordered categories. Li Y; Ghosh D BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():108. PubMed ID: 24731138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple testing in large-scale genetic studies. Bouaziz M; Jeanmougin M; Guedj M Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():213-33. PubMed ID: 22665284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies. Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments. Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple testing and its applications to microarrays. Ge Y; Sealfon SC; Speed TP Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Dec; 18(6):543-63. PubMed ID: 20048384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The false discovery rate: a key concept in large-scale genetic studies. Chen JJ; Roberson PK; Schell MJ Cancer Control; 2010 Jan; 17(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 20010520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments. Storey JD; Dai JY; Leek JT Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):414-32. PubMed ID: 16928955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]