172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1574196)
1. A minority report?
Slobodien HD
N J Med; 1992 Mar; 89(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 1574196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. MedPAC report pins payment system flaws on 'overvalued' services.
Med Health; 2006 Mar; 60(11):1, 4. PubMed ID: 16541671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. RBRVS revisited. Midterm report card shows Medicare payment system still has problems.
Richardson M
Tex Med; 1994 Mar; 90(3):22-4. PubMed ID: 8009452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality endorsement. MedPAC backs tying Medicare payments to quality.
Tieman J
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(25):7. PubMed ID: 12858717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare cost limits: exceptions to the rules.
Hedlund CT
Caring; 1994 Nov; 13(11):4, 7, 82. PubMed ID: 10138558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives. Can a focus on quality even out Medicare pay, control costs?
Med Health; 2002 Feb; 56(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 12476711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CMS tries cash this time. New quality reporting program has financial incentives.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(15):12-3. PubMed ID: 17494350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Unexpected" death and other report cards on access and ethics.
D'Oronzio JC
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(4):549-52. PubMed ID: 8563966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Revolt over IT requirements: AMA blasts ICD-10, while CMS relents on 5010.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2011 Nov; 41(47):12-3. PubMed ID: 22175210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual costs. Feds, states focus on ways to improve care and rein in spending for high-cost patients eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare.
Daly R
Mod Healthc; 2012 May; 42(19):28-30. PubMed ID: 22670270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. CMS issues final quality assessment and improvement conditions of participation for hospitals.
Healthc Leadersh Manag Rep; 2003 Jan; 11(1):11. PubMed ID: 12658960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Louisiana Medicare payments of Part A and B.
Ellis MS
J La State Med Soc; 1994 Jul; 146(7):298-311. PubMed ID: 7930859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dollars for quality?
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2008 Oct; 104(10):35-9. PubMed ID: 19009461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospitals cry foul. Preventable readmission penalty brings concerns.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2010 May; 40(22):10-1. PubMed ID: 20540196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nursing home care: ensuring quality.
Benjamin GC
Physician Exec; 1998; 24(6):64-5. PubMed ID: 10351722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Care coordination: transition between providers can be the most dangerous for patients.
Serota M; Ridley A
Med Econ; 2013 Aug; 90(16):41-2. PubMed ID: 24830089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicare ACOs no longer mythical creatures.
Mulvany C
Healthc Financ Manage; 2011 Jun; 65(6):96-104. PubMed ID: 21692381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive services and the New World order.
Newman JH
Del Med J; 1993 May; 65(5):333-4. PubMed ID: 8314407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisions to payment policies under Medicare physician fee schedule proposed for 1999.
Smith WJ
J Nucl Med; 1998 Aug; 39(8):32N-34N. PubMed ID: 9708497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Value purchasing in Medicare law: precursor to health reform.
Gosfield AG
Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(1-2):169-86. PubMed ID: 7801976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
