69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15742028)
1. [Right to second opinion].
Sander S; Berg K
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Feb; 125(4):466-7. PubMed ID: 15742028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Patients' right of health status assessment].
Myklebust I; Jordal H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 May; 123(11):1558-9. PubMed ID: 12968614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical and legal implications in seeking and providing a second medical opinion.
Axon A; Hassan M; Niv Y; Beglinger C; Rokkas T
Dig Dis; 2008; 26(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 18097139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second opinions and related topics.
Pandya SK
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(6):332-3. PubMed ID: 15736558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Martha's rule and patients' rights to a second opinion.
Cooksley T; Astbury S; Holland M
BMJ; 2023 Oct; 383():2221. PubMed ID: 37783488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Seeking a second opinion: do patients need a second opinion when practice guidelines exist?
Moumjid N; Gafni A; Bremond A; Carrere MO
Health Policy; 2007 Jan; 80(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 16584804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A project without leadership].
Haugerud MH; Varvin K
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(15):1952-3. PubMed ID: 16937576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What would you do? Reproductive rights.
Weiss GG
Med Econ; 2006 Nov; 83(21):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 17154109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic psychiatry corner 3--the issue of anonymity in lay referrals.
Kalian M; Mester R
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2004; 41(4):306-7. PubMed ID: 15941025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cancer--the desire for a second opinion is prompted by a need for orientation].
Schmidmaier R
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Dec; 148(49-50):31-3. PubMed ID: 17619324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrepancy between second and first opinion in surgical oncological patients.
Mellink WA; Henzen-Logmans SC; Bongaerts AH; Ooijen BV; Rodenburg CJ; Wiggers TH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb; 32(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 16303280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. General commentary on access to cardiovascular care in Canada: universal access, but when? Treating the right patient at the right time.
O'Neill BJ; Brophy JM; Simpson CS; Sholdice MM; Knudtson M; Ross DB; Ross H; Rottger J; Glasgow K; Kryworuk P;
Can J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 21(14):1272-6. PubMed ID: 16341295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Policy on the ethics of failure to treat or refer.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs
Pediatr Dent; 2005-2006; 27(7 Suppl):61. PubMed ID: 16541895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the second opinion always better than the first?
Carr N
Pathology; 2010; 42(5):498; author reply 498-9. PubMed ID: 20632838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of specialist neuroradiology second opinion reporting: is there added value?
Briggs GM; Flynn PA; Worthington M; Rennie I; McKinstry CS
Clin Radiol; 2008 Jul; 63(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 18555037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking a second look: some opinions on the second opinion.
Pandya SK
Issues Med Ethics; 1998 Jan; 6(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16267920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The second opinion in dentistry. An opportunity to educate, not to solicit.
Moskowitz EM
N Y State Dent J; 2005 Apr; 71(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 16013675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Second that opinion.
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2001 Jul; 8(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11511463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A second opinion.
Ridley-Smith RM
N Z Med J; 2008 Nov; 121(1286):136-7. PubMed ID: 19098960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
