These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15742358)

  • 1. Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables.
    Kaufman S; Kaufman JS; MacLehose RF; Greenland S; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1683-702. PubMed ID: 15742358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bounds on controlled direct effects under monotonic assumptions about mediators and confounders.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):628-37. PubMed ID: 20886528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpreting treatment-effect estimates with heterogeneity and choice: simulation model results.
    Brooks JM; Fang G
    Clin Ther; 2009 Apr; 31(4):902-19. PubMed ID: 19446162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of direct causal effects.
    Petersen ML; Sinisi SE; van der Laan MJ
    Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):276-84. PubMed ID: 16617276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
    Chan KC
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bounds on natural direct effects in the presence of confounded intermediate variables.
    Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):558-71. PubMed ID: 19035530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Instrumental variables: application and limitations.
    Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
    Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 16617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
    Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
    Chiba Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19879376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of random coefficient regression in accounting for residual confounding.
    Gustafson P; Greenland S
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):760-8. PubMed ID: 16984318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal models for estimating the effects of weight gain on mortality.
    Robins JM
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Aug; 32 Suppl 3():S15-41. PubMed ID: 18695650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of mis-specification of the treatment model on estimates from a marginal structural model.
    Lefebvre G; Delaney JA; Platt RW
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(18):3629-42. PubMed ID: 18254127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of longitudinal marginal structural models.
    Bryan J; Yu Z; Van Der Laan MJ
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jul; 5(3):361-80. PubMed ID: 15208200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the response rate in the presence of measurement error.
    Qu Y; Kulkarni PM; Sanger TM
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):197-211. PubMed ID: 16526011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.