These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15742576)

  • 61. Do we still need a federal patients' bill of rights?
    Law SA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 3(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 12825425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Bargaining with Hippocrates: managed care and the doctor-patient relationship.
    Hall TS
    S C Law Rev; 2003; 54(3):689-740. PubMed ID: 15214354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The two faces of gag provisions: patients and physicians in a bind.
    Brand GS; Munoz GM; Nichols MG; Okata MU; Pitt JB; Seager S
    Yale Law Policy Rev; 1998; 17():249-80. PubMed ID: 16437824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Independent medical review: expanding legal remedies to achieve managed care accountability.
    Berman-Sandler L
    Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(1):233-302, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15002185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Calif. ruling orders up hitch for employer mandate. Citing ERISA, court sides with S.F restaurant association on mandatory insurance.
    Vesely R
    Mod Healthc; 2008 Jan; 38(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 18271194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The end of 'fair share'? With Maryland law struck down, states work to protect coverage mandates.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2007 Mar; 37(12):48, 50. PubMed ID: 17427634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. COBRA for state and local governmental plans.
    Cabral AB
    Empl Benefits J; 2003 Dec; 28(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 14712734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. After Bragdon v. Abbott: why legislation is still needed to mandate infertility insurance.
    Roche JB
    Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):215-28. PubMed ID: 16493793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Transparency and the Supreme Court--Can Employers Refuse to Disclose How Much They Pay for Health Care?
    Bagley N; Koller C
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(27):e34. PubMed ID: 26605801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. 'MetLife V. Glenn': the Court addresses a conflict over conflicts in ERISA benefit administration.
    Jost TS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(5):w430-40. PubMed ID: 18768537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Regulating managed care into the 21st century.
    Carneal G
    Med Interface; 1994 Nov; 7(11):111-2, 114. PubMed ID: 10138698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. ERISA's second wind: the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Aetna v Davila is a victory for health plans, but payers, providers must still negotiate potential mine fields.
    Manzanares J; Mandell J
    Healthc Leadersh Rep; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15771201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. ERISA preemption of medical negligence claims against managed care providers: the search for an effective theory and an appropriate remedy.
    Minc GJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 10160178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. ERISA and managed care: the law abhors a vacuum.
    Farrell MG
    J Health Hosp Law; 1996 Dec; 29(5):268-87. PubMed ID: 10164235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of delegation on standard of review. Geddes v. United Staffing, 469 F.3d 919 (10th Cir. 2006).
    Benefits Q; 2009; 25(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 19408446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. AIDS and ERISA preemption: the double threat.
    Bruner JR
    Duke Law J; 1992 Apr; 41(5):1115-56. PubMed ID: 11654910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Undermining ERISA.
    Borges W
    Tex Med; 2000 Aug; 96(8):34-8. PubMed ID: 10948835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Protecting the subrogation rights of self-insured group health plans.
    Irving A; Flaherty K
    Empl Benefits J; 2001 Jun; 26(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 11372499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Federal insurance reform. A drop in your state's bucket?
    Ladenheim K
    Bus Health; 1996 Oct; 14(10):37-9, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 10161488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Court decisions hold implications for managed care plans--Part two.
    McCann RW
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 10113259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.