1142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15742581)
21. Health care on trial: America's medical malpractice crisis.
Kereiakes DJ; Willerson JT
Circulation; 2004 Jun; 109(24):2939-41. PubMed ID: 15210609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Tort reform in Tennessee: the next "crisis" state?
Williams B
Tenn Med; 2003 Apr; 96(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 12704999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Leveling the paying field: can malpractice be made fair? Pennsylvania study examines various reforms.
Shinkman R
Healthc Leadersh Manag Rep; 2003 Jun; 11(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 12959061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Partnering for malpractice reform.
Belfiglio G
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 12675003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Malpractice reform: one state's example.
Saxton JW; Finkelstein MM
Manag Care Interface; 2003 Jul; 16(7):45-8. PubMed ID: 12908218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tort reform battle captured in AMS video.
Zeno ZL
J Ark Med Soc; 2003 Jul; 100(1):6, 12. PubMed ID: 12874928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Premium discontent. No reason to cap malpractice insurance: study.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2006 May; 36(20):17. PubMed ID: 16752863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Commentary: malpractice reform in policy perspective.
Bovbjerg RR
Milbank Q; 2007 Jun; 85(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 17517117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An economic assessment of damage caps in medical malpractice litigation imposed by state laws and the implications for federal policy and law.
Frech HE; Hamm WG; Wazzan CP
Health Matrix Clevel; 2006; 16(2):693-722. PubMed ID: 16948253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A medical mistake.
Schmitt CH
US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Are new liability caps working?
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2003 Feb; 12(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 12658849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Liable to be at risk. Absent tort reform, doctors, patients face fallout from malpractice verdicts.
Corlin R
Mod Healthc; 2002 Jun; 32(23):26. PubMed ID: 12096426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Moving beyond the blame game.
Ignagni K
Front Health Serv Manage; 2003; 20(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 14510312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Contingency fee legal actions in the U.S.A.
Hershkowitz L
Med Health R I; 2005 Jan; 88(1):35. PubMed ID: 15779559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Malpractice reform now.
Ignagni K
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):7. PubMed ID: 12675001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Legal. Legal experiments.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 16128312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defending the practice of medicine.
Anderson RE
Arch Intern Med; 2004 Jun; 164(11):1173-8. PubMed ID: 15197041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
Dwyer CL
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. ['No cure, no pay' in Dutch health care: fear of a culture of unwarranted claims].
Legemaate J
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Apr; 147(16):740-2. PubMed ID: 12731462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The anatomy of a lawsuit: Part 6.
Ashley RC
Crit Care Nurse; 2003 Aug; 23(4):89. PubMed ID: 12961788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
