These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15742719)

  • 1. Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hanekom T
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Jan; 43(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15742719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional spiraling finite element model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.
    Hanekom T
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 11527037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of damage by cochlear implant electrode array's proximal section to the basilar membrane.
    Kha H; Chen B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1176-80. PubMed ID: 22872176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
    Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Placement on the Current Spread in the Cochlea.
    Schafer F; Enke J; Bohnke F; Hemmert W; Bai S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():6145-6148. PubMed ID: 30441737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19063955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of electrode position on spatiotemporal auditory nerve fiber responses: a 3D computational model study.
    Kang S; Chwodhury T; Moon IJ; Hong SH; Yang H; Won JH; Woo J
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():934382. PubMed ID: 25755675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The nerve-electrode interface of the cochlear implant: current spread.
    Liang DH; Lusted HS; White RL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Jan; 46(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 9919824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pattern and degree of capsular fibrous sheaths surrounding cochlear electrode arrays.
    Ishai R; Herrmann BS; Nadol JB; Quesnel AM
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():44-53. PubMed ID: 28216124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D finite element analyses of insertion of the Nucleus standard straight and the Contour electrode arrays into the human cochlea.
    Kha HN; Chen BK; Clark GM
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(12):2796-805. PubMed ID: 17408675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midbrain responses to micro-stimulation of the cochlea using high density thin-film arrays.
    Allitt BJ; Morgan SJ; Bell S; Nayagam DA; Arhatari B; Clark GM; Paolini AG
    Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 22531007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.