BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1574294)

  • 1. Making decisions for minors: do parents have the final say? Case study and commentaries.
    Weinstein BD; Weinstein GW
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1992 Mar; 23(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 1574294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified?
    Rosato JL
    Temple Law Rev; 2000; 73(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 12449931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical decision making for children: an analysis of competing interests.
    Ewald LS
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Oct; 25(4):689-733. PubMed ID: 11658427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Crutchfield CF
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Withdrawal of treatment for minors in a persistent vegetative state: parents should decide.
    Massie AM
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):173-218. PubMed ID: 12645558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
    Obernberger S
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic testing of children for adult-onset diseases: is testing in the child's best interests?
    Pelias MK
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 May; 73(3):605-8. PubMed ID: 16758098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ultimate test of autonomy: should minors have a right to make decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment?
    Rosato JL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1996; 49(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11865878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The competent child's preference in clinical medical decisions: a proposal for its consideration.
    Mark LB
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1983; 11(1):25-58. PubMed ID: 16086470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law: parental denial of a child's medical treatment for religious reasons.
    Trahan J
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1989; 1989(1):307-41. PubMed ID: 16594107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
    Redding RE
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's rights: removing the parental consent barrier to medical treatment of minors.
    Wilkins LP
    Ariz State Law J; 1975; 1975(1):31-92. PubMed ID: 11664511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
    Murphy JJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF; Martinez S
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethical issues of enforcing parents' participation in the psychiatric treatment of minors.
    Jaworowski S
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1997; 34(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9175341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collision between law and ethics: consent for treatment with adolescents.
    Shields JM; Johnson A
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):309-23. PubMed ID: 1421561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The journey of a child and his heart: a decade of transformation in the legal, medical, and ethical care of a child with Down syndrome.
    Gathman GE
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8049765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The case. What should Leah be told?
    Lantos JD
    Second Opin; 1993 Apr; 18(4):81-6. PubMed ID: 10125419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.