168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1574314)
1. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: the Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit.
Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC; Schneeberger P; Buser D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 11402291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; van Steenberghe D; Bosmans H; Sanderink GC; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11168275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.
Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8508935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques.
Clark DE; Danforth RA; Barnes RW; Burtch ML
J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 2098559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.
Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Nogueira MS; Silva TA; Shibli JA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20491821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbed doses at varying tube voltage in lateral cephalography.
Eliasson S; Julin P; Philip A; Stenström B
Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 3860993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of radiation geometry and radiation doses during radiography with an intraoral x-ray tube (Philips Stat ORALIX).
Blomgren PG; Hollender L; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1978; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 291551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Absorbed doses from temporomandibular joint radiography.
Brooks SL; Lanzetta ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 3859827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry of absorbed radiation in radiographic cephalometry.
Gilda JE; Maillie HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 May; 73(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 1518655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
