These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1574314)

  • 1. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. Absorbed doses to critical organs.
    Underhill TE; Chilvarquer I; Kimura K; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Preece JW; Barnwell G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jul; 66(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 3165508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: the Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC; Schneeberger P; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):735-42. PubMed ID: 11402291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organ radiation dose assessment for conventional spiral tomography: a human cadaver study.
    Bou Serhal C; van Steenberghe D; Bosmans H; Sanderink GC; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11168275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose protocol of the spiral CT in orthodontics: comparative evaluation of entrance skin dose with traditional X-ray techniques.
    Cordasco G; Portelli M; Militi A; Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Gatto E; Lucchese A
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():24. PubMed ID: 24325970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander A; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8508935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques.
    Clark DE; Danforth RA; Barnes RW; Burtch ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 2098559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.
    Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Nogueira MS; Silva TA; Shibli JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20491821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Absorbed doses at varying tube voltage in lateral cephalography.
    Eliasson S; Julin P; Philip A; Stenström B
    Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 3860993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
    Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of radiation geometry and radiation doses during radiography with an intraoral x-ray tube (Philips Stat ORALIX).
    Blomgren PG; Hollender L; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1978; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 291551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbed doses from temporomandibular joint radiography.
    Brooks SL; Lanzetta ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 3859827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetry of absorbed radiation in radiographic cephalometry.
    Gilda JE; Maillie HD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 May; 73(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 1518655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.