589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15744271)
1. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
Pearson H
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HIV denialists will exploit any journal's tolerance.
Moore JP
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):777. PubMed ID: 14985731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning to review.
Freedman R
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Jefferson T; Shashok K
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The contemporary landscape of journal publishing.
McKenna L
Collegian; 2016; 23(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 27188033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CONSORT and beyond.
Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Providing the best for our patients: evidence-based practice.
Pearson L
Nurse Pract; 2001 Mar; 26(3):11-2, 15. PubMed ID: 11270152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
Michell B
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Predatory Publishing: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You.
Nolfi DA; Lockhart JS; Myers CR
Nurse Educ; 2015; 40(5):217-9. PubMed ID: 25997152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
Popp RL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
Randleman JB
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
Enserink M
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
