214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15744810)
1. The utility of multi-detector row spiral CT for detection of coronary artery stenoses.
Moon JY; Chung N; Choi BW; Choe KO; Seo HS; Ko YG; Kang SM; Ha JW; Rim SJ; Jang Y; Shim WH; Cho SY
Yonsei Med J; 2005 Feb; 46(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 15744810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation.
Achenbach S; Ropers D; Pohle FK; Raaz D; von Erffa J; Yilmaz A; Muschiol G; Daniel WG
Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(19):1978-86. PubMed ID: 15923203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.
Ropers D; Baum U; Pohle K; Anders K; Ulzheimer S; Ohnesorge B; Schlundt C; Bautz W; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
Circulation; 2003 Feb; 107(5):664-6. PubMed ID: 12578863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical value of 16-slice multi-detector CT compared to invasive coronary angiography.
Aviram G; Finkelstein A; Herz I; Lessick J; Miller H; Graif M; Keren G
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16019611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ECG-gated 16-MDCT of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and accuracy in detecting stenoses.
Heuschmid M; Kuettner A; Schroeder S; Trabold T; Feyer A; Seemann MD; Kuzo R; Claussen CD; Kopp AF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1413-9. PubMed ID: 15855088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heart imaging: the accuracy of the 64-MSCT in the detection of coronary artery disease.
Alessandri N; Di Matteo A; Rondoni G; Petrassi M; Tufani F; Ferrari R; Laghi A
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2009; 13(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 19673166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
Garcia MJ; Lessick J; Hoffmann MH;
JAMA; 2006 Jul; 296(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 16868298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.
Marano R; Storto ML; Maddestra N; Bonomo L
Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1353-62. PubMed ID: 15103498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value and limitations of multislice spiral CT in diagnosing coronary artery stenoses].
Wang ZQ; Zhu H; Zhou XC; Yang ZQ; Jia CF; Sun XX; Wang HY
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 36(11):989-93. PubMed ID: 19102911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.
Kuettner A; Beck T; Drosch T; Kettering K; Heuschmid M; Burgstahler C; Claussen CD; Kopp AF; Schroeder S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jan; 45(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 15629385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses.
Ropers D; Rixe J; Anders K; Küttner A; Baum U; Bautz W; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 97(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 16442393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with 320-detector row computed tomography.
Nasis A; Leung MC; Antonis PR; Cameron JD; Lehman SJ; Hope SA; Crossett MP; Troupis JM; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 106(10):1429-35. PubMed ID: 21059432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 64-slice MDCT in the real world of cardiology: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography.
Sirol M; Sanz J; Henry P; Rymer R; Leber A
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 May; 102(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 19520329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection--initial results.
Gerber BL; Coche E; Pasquet A; Ketelslegers E; Vancraeynest D; Grandin C; Van Beers BE; Vanoverschelde JL
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 15550371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenoses by multidetector-row spiral computed tomography: comparison with conventional angiography.
Gaudio C; Mirabelli F; Alessandrà L; Nguyen BL; Di Michele S; Corsi F; Tanzilli G; Mancone M; Pannarale G; Francone M; Carbone I; Catalano C; Passariello R; Fedele F
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2005; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15850140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary imaging with 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution.
Kuettner A; Beck T; Drosch T; Kettering K; Heuschmid M; Burgstahler C; Claussen CD; Kopp AF; Schroeder S
Heart; 2005 Jul; 91(7):938-41. PubMed ID: 15958366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive imaging of coronary artery with 16-slice spiral computed tomography.
Zhang ZH; Jin ZY; Li DJ; Lin SB; Zhang SY; Kong LY; Wang Y; Wang LH; Zhao WM; Mou WB; Zhang LR; Zhu WL; Ni C; Ren H; Yu HQ; Miao Q; Fang Q
Chin Med Sci J; 2004 Sep; 19(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 15506642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noninvasive analysis of coronary artery disease with combination of MDCT and functional MRI.
Holmström M; Vesterinen P; Hänninen H; Sillanpää MA; Kivistö S; Lauerma K
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 16428053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation.
Ropers D; Pohle FK; Kuettner A; Pflederer T; Anders K; Daniel WG; Bautz W; Baum U; Achenbach S
Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(22):2334-41; quiz 2334. PubMed ID: 17088461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries: is 16-slice multidetector CT useful?
Türkvatan A; Biyikoğlu SF; Büyükbayraktar FG; Cumhur T; Duru E; Olçer T; Ulaş MM
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2009 Mar; 15(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19263374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
