483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15744895)
1. Safeguarding human genetic privacy.
Judicature; 2003; 86(5):224. PubMed ID: 15744895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Whose genes are they anyway?
Nelkin D; Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 1999 May; 45():B6. PubMed ID: 14598853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.
Banks TM
Sask Law Rev; 2000; 63(2):539-80. PubMed ID: 12666671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical considerations of genetic testing.
Fleming DA
J Clin Ethics; 2002; 13(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 12793324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA: five distinguishing features for policy analysis.
Green RM; Thomas AM
Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):571-91. PubMed ID: 12731549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Disclosing genetic research results after death of pediatric patients.
Sexton AC; Metcalfe SA
JAMA; 2008 Oct; 300(14):1693-5. PubMed ID: 18840844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic testing and human subjects in research.
Laidlaw SA; Raffel LJ; Daar JF
Whittier Law Rev; 2002; 24(2):429-72. PubMed ID: 15085855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The allure and peril of genetics exceptionalism: do we need special genetics legislation?
Suter SM
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(3):669-748. PubMed ID: 12741377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic anonymity: have we already lost it?
Greenbaum D; Du J; Gerstein M
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):71-4. PubMed ID: 19003717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace.
Feitshans IL
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The limits of state laws to protect genetic information.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2001 Aug; 345(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11484711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Population-based genetic studies: informed consent and confidentiality.
Smith MJ
Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 2001 Dec; 18(1):57-93. PubMed ID: 12741383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination.
Baumann TK
Iowa Law Rev; 2001 Jan; 86(2):667-701. PubMed ID: 16184651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy, informed consent, and genetic testing: an uneasy tension.
Hamilton R; Bowers B
J Nurs Law; 2003 May; 9(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 15282895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic testing: technology that is changing the adoption process.
Schlee JA
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):133-83. PubMed ID: 12962109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Privacy and confidentiality in the age of genetic engineering.
Poste G
Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 15706720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Negotiating a policy of prudent science and proactive law in the brave new world of genetic information.
Chen S
Hastings Law J; 2001 Nov; 53(1):243-63. PubMed ID: 12680379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information?
Slaughter LM
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Human Genome Project and public perception: truth and consequences.
Pelias MZ; Markward NJ
Emory Law J; 2000; 49(3):837-58. PubMed ID: 12645564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic secrets and the family: a response to Bell and Bennett.
Skene L
Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 12778931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
