46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15744901)
1. Genetic horoscopes: is it all in the genes? Points for regulatory control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Patch C; Sequeiros J; Cornel MC
Eur J Hum Genet; 2009 Jul; 17(7):857-9. PubMed ID: 19259126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personal genetics: regulatory framework in Europe from a service provider's perspective.
Grimaldi KA; Look MP; Scioli GA; Clavero JC; Marinos S; Tagaris T
Eur J Hum Genet; 2011 Apr; 19(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 21119713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Framing utility: Regulatory reform and genetic tests in the USA, 1989-2000.
Sturdy S
Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jul; 304():112924. PubMed ID: 32245545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The need for increased oversight of genetic testing: a detailed look at the genetic testing process.
Bonnin DC
Houst J Health Law Policy; 2003; 4(1):149-80. PubMed ID: 16596751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Oversight of US genetic testing laboratories.
Hudson KL; Murphy JA; Kaufman DJ; Javitt GH; Katsanis SH; Scott J
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1083-90. PubMed ID: 16964214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Separating predictive genetic testing from snake oil: regulation, liabilities, and lost opportunities.
Malinowski MJ
Jurimetrics; 2000; 41(1):23-52. PubMed ID: 15744897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. US urged to monitor some genetic tests.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6616):477. PubMed ID: 9020348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A conceptual framework for genetic policy: comparing the medical, public health, and fundamental rights models.
Andrews LB
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(152):221-85. PubMed ID: 16211786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Commercialization of genetic testing services: the FDA, market forces, and biological tarot cards.
Malinowski MJ; Blatt RJ
Tulane Law Rev; 1997 Mar; 71(4):1211-312. PubMed ID: 15744901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of race/ethnicity on genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Forman AD; Hall MJ
Breast J; 2009; 15 Suppl 1():S56-62. PubMed ID: 19775331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.
Schlich-Bakker KJ; ten Kroode HF; Ausems MG
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jul; 62(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 16242293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility.
Robson ME; Storm CD; Weitzel J; Wollins DS; Offit K;
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20065170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
