470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15745773)
1. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes.
Kriechbaum K; Findl O; Koeppl C; Menapace R; Drexler W
Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 15745773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial.
Findl O; Kriechbaum K; Menapace R; Koeppl C; Sacu S; Wirtitsch M; Buehl W; Drexler W
Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1515-21. PubMed ID: 15288981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry.
Tsorbatzoglou A; Németh G; Máth J; Berta A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1345-50. PubMed ID: 16863973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 6-month results of implantation of the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens with conventional intraocular lenses.
Küchle M; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Gusek-Schneider GC; Martus P; Nguyen NX;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 15019382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis with posterior optic buttonholing on pilocarpine-induced IOL shift.
Leydolt C; Menapace R; Stifter EM; Prinz A; Neumayer T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1895-901. PubMed ID: 22858061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens.
Koeppl C; Findl O; Menapace R; Kriechbaum K; Wirtitsch M; Buehl W; Sacu S; Drexler W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1290-7. PubMed ID: 16105597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of patient motivation on near vision in pseudophakic patients.
Leydolt C; Neumayer T; Prinz A; Findl O
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 147(3):398-405.e3. PubMed ID: 19019338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial.
Harman FE; Maling S; Kampougeris G; Langan L; Khan I; Lee N; Bloom PA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Jun; 115(6):993-1001.e2. PubMed ID: 18031818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pilocarpine-induced and stimulus-driven accommodation in phakic eyes.
Koeppl C; Findl O; Kriechbaum K; Drexler W
Exp Eye Res; 2005 Jun; 80(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 15939035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction.
Findl O; Kiss B; Petternel V; Menapace R; Georgopoulos M; Rainer G; Drexler W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Apr; 29(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 12686233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Drug-induced intraocular lens movement and near visual acuity after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation.
Muftuoglu O; Hosal BM; Karel F; Zilelioglu G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1298-305. PubMed ID: 16105598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional vision after cataract removal with multifocal and accommodating intraocular lens implantation: prospective comparative evaluation of Array multifocal and 1CU accommodating lenses.
Claoué C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2088-91. PubMed ID: 15474819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Validity of anterior chamber depth measurements for the evaluation of accommodation after implantation of an accommodative Humanoptics 1CU intraocular lens].
Auffarth GU; Martin M; Fuchs HA; Rabsilber TM; Becker KA; Schmack I
Ophthalmologe; 2002 Nov; 99(11):815-9. PubMed ID: 12430032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Toda I; Fujishima H; Arai H; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Hida Y; Yagi Y; Tsubota K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 15975453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of accommodation amplitudes in pseudophakic eyes measured with three different methods.
Nemeth G; Tsorbatzoglou A; Vamosi P; Sohajda Z; Berta A
Eye (Lond); 2008 Jan; 22(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16858433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pilot study of new focus-shift accommodating intraocular lens.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Marshall J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 20457367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses.
Findl O; Leydolt C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 17321405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
