These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1574614)

  • 1. Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites.
    Mitchell JV
    Risk Anal; 1992 Mar; 12(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 1574614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program.
    Charnley S; Engelbert B
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Nov; 77(3):165-82. PubMed ID: 16112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Great lakes research--important human health findings and their impact on ATSDR's Superfund research program.
    Hicks HE; De Rosa CT
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):49-61. PubMed ID: 12018016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study.
    Peters RG; Covello VT; McCallum DB
    Risk Anal; 1997 Feb; 17(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 9131825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public meetings and risk amplification: a longitudinal study.
    McComas KA
    Risk Anal; 2003 Dec; 23(6):1257-70. PubMed ID: 14641899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knowledge-based representations of risk beliefs.
    Tonn BE; Travis CB; Goeltz RT; Phillippi RH
    Risk Anal; 1990 Mar; 10(1):169-84. PubMed ID: 2184471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
    Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk perception, risk communication, and stakeholder involvement for biosolids management and research.
    Beecher N; Harrison E; Goldstein N; McDaniel M; Field P; Susskind L
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 15647541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What do lay people want to know about the disposal of nuclear waste? A mental model approach to the design and development of an online risk communication.
    Skarlatidou A; Cheng T; Haklay M
    Risk Anal; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1496-511. PubMed ID: 22324812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health risk communication at the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
    Johnson BL
    Risk Anal; 1987 Dec; 7(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 3444927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superfund research program--accomplishments and future opportunities.
    Au WW; Falk H
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):165-8. PubMed ID: 12018012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collaboration and importance of federally sponsored Superfund research programs.
    Spengler RF; Anderson BE; Zenick H
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 205(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 12018001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception.
    Trumbo CW; McComas KA
    Risk Anal; 2003 Apr; 23(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 12731818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social contagion of risk perceptions in environmental management networks.
    Muter BA; Gore ML; Riley SJ
    Risk Anal; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1489-99. PubMed ID: 23231537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk communication discourse among ecological risk assessment professionals and its implications for communication with nonexperts.
    Hunka AD; Palmqvist A; Thorbek P; Forbes VE
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):616-22. PubMed ID: 23606562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Get plugged in. East Central Michigan hospitals restore public trust through better communication.
    Pratt P
    Trustee; 1999 Oct; 52(9):18-22. PubMed ID: 10621495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Public reaction to toxic waste contamination: analysis of a social movement.
    Masterson-Allen S; Brown P
    Int J Health Serv; 1990; 20(3):485-500. PubMed ID: 2384288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An overview of occupational safety and health guidelines for Superfund sites.
    Ferguson JS; Martin WF
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Apr; 46(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 4003267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health effects of a Superfund hazardous chemical waste disposal site.
    Najem GR; Strunck T; Feuerman M
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 7917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenge posed to children's health by mixtures of toxic waste: the Tar Creek superfund site as a case-study.
    Hu H; Shine J; Wright RO
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2007 Feb; 54(1):155-75, x. PubMed ID: 17306689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.